These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Adler S; Scherrer M; Rückauer KD; Daschner FD Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does Cost Influence the Choice of Disposable Versus Reusable Instruments? Mailed Survey of Obstetrician/Gynaecologists. Yang H; Capstick VA; Bentz C; Ross S J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Oct; 41(10):1416-1422. PubMed ID: 30885506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study]. Paolucci V; Schaeff B; Gutt C; Morawe G; Encke A Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7887039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety. Siu J; Hill AG; MacCormick AD ANZ J Surg; 2017 Jan; 87(1-2):28-33. PubMed ID: 27878921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Slater M; Booth MI; Dehn TC Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2009 Nov; 91(8):670-2. PubMed ID: 19785946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preliminary survey findings. Reusable vs. disposable laparoscopic instruments. Cahill N Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 May; 78(5):28-9. PubMed ID: 10125975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reducing disposable equipment waste for tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy cases. Penn E; Yasso SF; Wei JL Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Oct; 147(4):615-8. PubMed ID: 22675005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments. DesCôteaux JG; Blackmore K; Parsons L Can J Surg; 1998 Apr; 41(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9575997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physician Engagement in Improving Operative Supply Chain Efficiency Through Review of Surgeon Preference Cards. Harvey LFB; Smith KA; Curlin H J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1116-1120. PubMed ID: 28669894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost analysis of minimally invasive surgery in a pediatric setting. Mahomed AA; McLean V J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2007 Jun; 17(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 17570792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments: a study of related surgical complications. DesCôteaux JG; Poulin EC; Lortie M; Murray G; Gingras S Can J Surg; 1995 Dec; 38(6):497-500. PubMed ID: 7497363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of laparoscopic splenectomy in developing countries: analysis of cost and strategies for reducing cost. Hamamci EO; Besim H; Bostanoglu S; Sonişik M; Korkmaz A J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2002 Aug; 12(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 12269492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instrument costs. Eddie G; White S Aust N Z J Surg; 1996 Oct; 66(10):671-5. PubMed ID: 8855921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]