These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15899024)

  • 1. Evaluation of internal adaptation in ceramic and composite resin inlays by silicon replica technique.
    Karakaya S; Sengun A; Ozer F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Jun; 32(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 15899024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of marginal fit of class II ceromer inlays.
    Gemalmaz D; Kükrer D
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jun; 33(6):436-42. PubMed ID: 16671990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces.
    Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
    Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal adaptation of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems.
    Soares CJ; Martins LR; Fernandes Neto AJ; Giannini M
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):689-94. PubMed ID: 14653281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal adaptation of ceramic inserts after cementation.
    Ozcan M; Pfeiffer P; Nergiz I
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 11931135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Porosity evaluation and pore size distribution of a novel directly placed ceramic restorative material.
    Geirsson J; Thompson JY; Bayne SC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Dec; 20(10):987-95. PubMed ID: 15501328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of light curing units on marginal adaptation and hardness of Class II composite resin restorations.
    Cavalcante LM; Peris AR; Silikas N; Pimenta LA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov; 8(7):38-45. PubMed ID: 17994153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal adaptation of a sintered ceramic inlay system before and after cementation.
    Gemalmaz D; Ozcan M; Yoruç AB; Alkumru HN
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Sep; 24(9):646-51. PubMed ID: 9357744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Marginal fit of ceramic and composite inlays in vitro].
    Reich E; Schmalz G; Federlin M
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Oct; 45(10):656-60. PubMed ID: 2269072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation between microleakage and cement thickness in three Class II inlay ceramic systems.
    Romão W; Miranda WG; Cesar PF; Braga RR
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 15088734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dye staining gap test: an alternative method for assessing marginal gap formation in composite restorations.
    Caroline Bruschi Alonso R; Maria Correr G; Gonçalves Cunha L; Flávia Sanches Borges A; Maria Puppin-Rontani R; Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti M
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Jun; 64(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 16809190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
    Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dimensional stability of two visible light-cured indirect inlay/onlay resin composite materials.
    Lynde TA; Schulman LB; Meiers JC; Whitehill JM
    Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):153-6. PubMed ID: 9002790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interface evaluation after manual and ultrasonic insertion of standardized class I inlays using composite resin materials of different viscosity.
    Schmidlin PR; Zehnder M; Schlup-Mityko C; Göhring TN
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2005 Aug; 63(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 16040442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.