These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15899338)

  • 1. DOSIS: a Monte Carlo simulation program for dose related studies in mammography.
    Delis H; Spyrou G; Panayiotakis G; Tzanakos G
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 15899338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Dance DR; Thilander AK; Sandborg M; Skinner CL; Castellano IA; Carlsson GA
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11271898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Suitability of new anode materials in mammography: dose and subject contrast considerations using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4221-35. PubMed ID: 17153401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Thickness of molybdenum filter and squared contrast-to-noise ratio per dose for digital mammography.
    Nishino TK; Wu X; Johnson RF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Oct; 185(4):960-3. PubMed ID: 16177415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MASTOS: Mammography Simulation Tool for design Optimization Studies.
    Spyrou G; Panayiotakis G; Tzanakos G
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2000; 25(4):275-93. PubMed ID: 11198189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimization of x-ray spectra in digital mammography through Monte Carlo simulations.
    Cunha DM; Tomal A; Poletti ME
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1919-35. PubMed ID: 22421418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
    Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
    Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of anode-filter combinations on image quality and radiation dose in 965 women undergoing mammography.
    Thilander-Klang AC; Ackerholm PH; Berlin IC; Bjurstam NG; Mattsson SL; Månsson LG; von Schéele C; Thunberg SJ
    Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 9114087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A GATE Monte Carlo framework for dosimetric evaluation in mammography in an Algerian hospital.
    Bouchikhi BA; Benhalouche S; Ati M; Khelassi Toutaoui N; Arbor N; Bendella SA; Dib ASA; Tebboune A; Belbachir AH; Taleb Ben Diab E
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Jul; 197():110797. PubMed ID: 37043867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-layer heterogeneous mammographic phantoms for Monte Carlo simulation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography.
    Chang TY; Lai KJ; Tu CY; Wu J
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2234. PubMed ID: 32042071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo generated conversion factors for the estimation of average glandular dose in contact and magnification mammography.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5539-48. PubMed ID: 17047268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum.
    Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Marshall N; Meylaers T; Michielsen K; Marchal G; Bosmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1057-68. PubMed ID: 20090185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo simulation of a mammographic test phantom.
    Hunt RA; Dance DR; Pachoud M; Alm Carlsson G; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Verdun FR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):432-5. PubMed ID: 15933151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calculation of the properties of digital mammograms using a computer simulation.
    Hunt RA; Dance DR; Bakic PR; Maidment AD; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Alm Carlsson G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):395-8. PubMed ID: 15933144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Homogeneous vs. patient specific breast models for Monte Carlo evaluation of mean glandular dose in mammography.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Di Lillo F; Bliznakova K; Sechopoulos I; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2018 Jul; 51():56-63. PubMed ID: 29705184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of the dose distribution for a cone beam CT system dedicated to breast imaging.
    Lanconelli N; Mettivier G; Lo Meo S; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 22763280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast composition and radiographic breast equivalence.
    McLean D
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Mar; 20(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 9141308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study.
    Chida K; Zuguchi M; Sai M; Saito H; Yamada T; Ishibashi T; Ito D; Kimoto N; Kohzuki M; Takahashi S
    Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS; Chourasiya G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 22232773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.