These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15899501)

  • 1. High variation in developmental instability under non-normal developmental error: a Bayesian perspective.
    Van Dongen S; Talloen W; Lens L
    J Theor Biol; 2005 Oct; 236(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 15899501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What do we know about the heritability of developmental instability? Answers from a Bayesian model.
    Van Dongen S
    Evolution; 2007 May; 61(5):1033-42. PubMed ID: 17492958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The normal distribution as appropriate model of developmental instability in Opuntia cacti flowers.
    Helsen P; Van Dongen S
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Jun; 22(6):1346-53. PubMed ID: 19457145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fluctuating asymmetry and developmental instability in evolutionary biology: past, present and future.
    Dongen SV
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Nov; 19(6):1727-43. PubMed ID: 17040371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phenotypic and genetic variations and correlations in multitrait developmental instability: a multivariate Bayesian model applied to Speckled Wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria) wing measurements.
    Van Dongen S; Talloen W
    Genet Res; 2007 Jun; 89(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 17894909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fluctuating asymmetry does not consistently reflect severe developmental disorders in human fetuses.
    Van Dongen S; Wijnaendts LC; Ten Broek CM; Galis F
    Evolution; 2009 Jul; 63(7):1832-44. PubMed ID: 19245674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolutionary history shapes the association between developmental instability and population-level genetic variation in three-spined sticklebacks.
    Van Dongen S; Lens L; Pape E; Volckaert FA; Raeymaekers JA
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Aug; 22(8):1695-707. PubMed ID: 19555450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A quantitative genetic method for estimating developmental instability.
    Waldmann P
    Evolution; 2004 Feb; 58(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 15068342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are fluctuating asymmetry studies adequately sampled? Implications of a new model for size distribution.
    Babbitt GA; Kiltie R; Bolker B
    Am Nat; 2006 Feb; 167(2):230-45. PubMed ID: 16670983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian estimation of species divergence times under a molecular clock using multiple fossil calibrations with soft bounds.
    Yang Z; Rannala B
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Jan; 23(1):212-26. PubMed ID: 16177230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Artificial selection reveals heritable variation for developmental instability.
    Carter AJ; Houle D
    Evolution; 2011 Dec; 65(12):3558-64. PubMed ID: 22133225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Embryological origins of developmental stability: size, shape and fluctuating asymmetry in prenatal random bred mice.
    Hallgrímsson B; Miyake T; Wilmore K; Hall BK
    J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2003 Apr; 296(1):40-57. PubMed ID: 12658710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robustness of a parametric model for informatively censored bivariate longitudinal data under misspecification of its distributional assumptions: A simulation study.
    Pantazis N; Touloumi G
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5473-85. PubMed ID: 18058854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Model misspecification and probabilistic tests of topology: evidence from empirical data sets.
    Buckley TR
    Syst Biol; 2002 Jun; 51(3):509-23. PubMed ID: 12079647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferring developmental modularity from morphological integration: analysis of individual variation and asymmetry in bumblebee wings.
    Klingenberg CP; Badyaev AV; Sowry SM; Beckwith NJ
    Am Nat; 2001 Jan; 157(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 18707232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the implications of the classical ergodic theorems: analysis of developmental processes has to focus on intra-individual variation.
    Molenaar PC
    Dev Psychobiol; 2008 Jan; 50(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 18085558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS.
    Lambert PC; Sutton AJ; Burton PR; Abrams KR; Jones DR
    Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2401-28. PubMed ID: 16015676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses: a simulation study of Bayesian and frequentist implementations of three models.
    Dohoo I; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
    Prev Vet Med; 2007 Sep; 81(1-3):38-55. PubMed ID: 17477995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian ranking of sites for engineering safety improvements: decision parameter, treatability concept, statistical criterion, and spatial dependence.
    Miaou SP; Song JJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Jul; 37(4):699-720. PubMed ID: 15949462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting and correcting bias caused by measurement error in line transect sampling using multiplicative error models.
    Marques TA
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):757-63. PubMed ID: 15339299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.