545 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15900606)
1. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1237-56. PubMed ID: 12111876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating diagnostic tests: The area under the ROC curve and the balance of errors.
Hand DJ
Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(14):1502-10. PubMed ID: 20087877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the ROC curve.
Qin G; Zhou XH
Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):613-22. PubMed ID: 16918927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
Wang F; Gatsonis CA
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.
Macaskill P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 15504635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of diagnostic tests performance: the ROC curve].
Van Meerhaeghe A
Rev Med Brux; 2002 Apr; 23(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 12056064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A permutation test sensitive to differences in areas for comparing ROC curves from a paired design.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2873-93. PubMed ID: 16134144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marker selection via maximizing the partial area under the ROC curve of linear risk scores.
Wang Z; Chang YC
Biostatistics; 2011 Apr; 12(2):369-85. PubMed ID: 20729218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comment on 'The partial area under the summary ROC curve'.
Nadarajah S
Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2731-4; author reply 2734-5. PubMed ID: 17910010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The agreement chart as an alternative to the receiver-operating characteristic curve for diagnostic tests.
Bangdiwala SI; Haedo AS; Natal ML; Villaveces A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):866-74. PubMed ID: 18687288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
Obuchowski NA
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ROC methodology within a monitoring framework.
Parker CB; DeLong ER
Stat Med; 2003 Nov; 22(22):3473-88. PubMed ID: 14601014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology of palpable breast masses: an SROC curve with fixed and random effects linear meta-regression models.
Akçil M; Karaağaoğlu E; Demirhan B
Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 May; 36(5):303-10. PubMed ID: 18418880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
Reitsma JB; Glas AS; Rutjes AW; Scholten RJ; Bossuyt PM; Zwinderman AH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 16168343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
