548 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15900606)
21. Bayesian estimation of the receiver operating characteristic curve for a diagnostic test with a limit of detection in the absence of a gold standard.
Jafarzadeh SR; Johnson WO; Utts JM; Gardner IA
Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2090-106. PubMed ID: 20603894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of non-parametric confidence intervals for the area under the ROC curve of a continuous-scale diagnostic test.
Gengsheng Qin ; Hotilovac L
Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Apr; 17(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 18426855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The analysis of placement values for evaluating discriminatory measures.
Pepe MS; Cai T
Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):528-35. PubMed ID: 15180681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Diagnostic value of anti-alpha-fodrin antibody testing for Sjögren's syndrome: a meta-analysis].
Huang QS; LE AP; Luo ZQ; Li JM; Wang WQ; Ju BH; Wan LG
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 88(42):2971-6. PubMed ID: 19080074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of 5 physical examination tests and combination of tests for subacromial impingement.
Michener LA; Walsworth MK; Doukas WC; Murphy KP
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 90(11):1898-903. PubMed ID: 19887215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Semi-parametric area under the curve regression method for diagnostic studies with ordinal data.
Rajan KB; Zhou XH
Biom J; 2012 Jan; 54(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 22161961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of clinical signs, SEP, and EEG in predicting outcome of hypoxic coma: a meta-analysis.
Lee YC; Phan TG; Jolley DJ; Castley HC; Ingram DA; Reutens DC
Neurology; 2010 Feb; 74(7):572-80. PubMed ID: 20157159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
Oddone F; Centofanti M; Iester M; Rossetti L; Fogagnolo P; Michelessi M; Capris E; Manni G
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1106-11.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19376590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An extension of the receiver operating characteristic curve and AUC-optimal classification.
Takenouchi T; Komori O; Eguchi S
Neural Comput; 2012 Oct; 24(10):2789-824. PubMed ID: 22734493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A global goodness-of-fit test for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis via the bootstrap method.
Zou KH; Resnic FS; Talos IF; Goldberg-Zimring D; Bhagwat JG; Haker SJ; Kikinis R; Jolesz FA; Ohno-Machado L
J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16198998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Meta-analysis of diagnostic capability of frequency-doubling technology (FDT) for primary glaucoma].
Liu T; He XG
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 May; 42(5):403-8. PubMed ID: 16762233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
Johnson NP
Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2257-66. PubMed ID: 15236429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Wilcoxon-based group sequential designs for comparison of areas under two correlated ROC curves.
Zhou XH; Li SM; Gatsonis CA
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 17357988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) and hierarchical SROC models for analysis of diagnostic test evaluations of antibody ELISAs for paratuberculosis.
Toft N; Nielsen SS
Prev Vet Med; 2009 Nov; 92(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 19747743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison between the two systems to evaluate the appropriateness of endoscopy of the upper digestive tract.
Bersani G; Rossi A; Suzzi A; Ricci G; De Fabritiis G; Alvisi V
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Nov; 99(11):2128-35. PubMed ID: 15554991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Transformation-invariant and nonparametric monotone smooth estimation of ROC curves.
Du P; Tang L
Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(2):349-59. PubMed ID: 18985706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessing the clinical benefits of erythropoietic agents using area under the hemoglobin change curve.
Duh MS; Lefebvre P; Fastenau J; Piech CT; Waltzman RJ
Oncologist; 2005; 10(6):438-48. PubMed ID: 15967837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A principled approach to setting optimal diagnostic thresholds: where ROC and indifference curves meet.
Irwin RJ; Irwin TC
Eur J Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 22(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 21570638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Magnetic resonance colonography versus colonoscopy as a diagnostic investigation for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Purkayastha S; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Aziz O; Negus R; Gedroyc W; Darzi AW
Clin Radiol; 2005 Sep; 60(9):980-9. PubMed ID: 16124980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Summary ROC curve based on a weighted Youden index for selecting an optimal cutpoint in meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.
Rücker G; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3069-78. PubMed ID: 21170902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
