251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15900742)
1. Modelling the biological performance of a side-stream membrane bioreactor using ASM1.
Tian KJ; Liu XA; Jiang T; Kennedy MD; Schippers JC; Vanrolleghem PA
J Environ Sci (China); 2004; 16(6):1020-3. PubMed ID: 15900742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Calibrating a side-stream membrane bioreactor using Activated Sludge Model No. 1.
Jiang T; Liu X; Kennedy MD; Schippers JC; Vanrolleghem PA
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):359-67. PubMed ID: 16459810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Activated sludge model (ASM) based modelling of membrane bioreactor (MBR) processes: a critical review with special regard to MBR specificities.
Fenu A; Guglielmi G; Jimenez J; Spèrandio M; Saroj D; Lesjean B; Brepols C; Thoeye C; Nopens I
Water Res; 2010 Aug; 44(15):4272-94. PubMed ID: 20619870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modelling of long-term simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SNDN) performance of a pilot scale membrane bioreactor.
Sarioglu M; Insel G; Artan N; Orhon D
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1825-33. PubMed ID: 18547937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation of biological and fouling characteristics of submerged membrane bioreactor process for wastewater treatment by model sensitivity analysis.
Cho JW; Ahn KH; Lee YH; Lim BR; Kim JY
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(2):245-54. PubMed ID: 14982187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Important operational parameters of membrane bioreactor-sludge disintegration (MBR-SD) system for zero excess sludge production.
Yoon SH
Water Res; 2003 Apr; 37(8):1921-31. PubMed ID: 12697235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Membrane bioreactor operation at short solids retention times: performance and biomass characteristics.
Ng HY; Hermanowicz SW
Water Res; 2005 Mar; 39(6):981-92. PubMed ID: 15766953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of tannery wastewater and biomass in a membrane bioreactor using respirometric analysis.
Munz G; Gori R; Cammilli L; Lubello C
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Dec; 99(18):8612-8. PubMed ID: 18499445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomass adaptation to complex substrate degradation in membrane bioreactors: appropriated operating conditions.
Sridang PC; Lobos J; Pottier A; Wisniewski C; Grasmick A
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18192738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is hydraulic retention time an essential parameter for MBR performance?
Viero AF; Sant'anna GL
J Hazard Mater; 2008 Jan; 150(1):185-6. PubMed ID: 17980957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment.
Radjenović J; Petrović M; Barceló D
Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):831-41. PubMed ID: 19091371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modelling a full scale membrane bioreactor using Activated Sludge Model No.1: challenges and solutions.
Delrue F; Choubert JM; Stricker AE; Spérandio M; Mietton-Peuchot M; Racault Y
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(10):2205-17. PubMed ID: 21076205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Activated Sludge Model No. 1 calibration for piggery wastewater treatment using respirometry.
Boursier H; Béline F; Paul E
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):389-95. PubMed ID: 15137449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel membrane bioreactor enhanced by effective microorganisms for the treatment of domestic wastewater.
Jin M; Wang XW; Gong TS; Gu CQ; Zhang B; Shen ZQ; Li JW
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2005 Nov; 69(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 16151803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of chemical sludge disintegration on the performances of wastewater treatment by membrane bioreactor.
Oh YK; Lee KR; Ko KB; Yeom IT
Water Res; 2007 Jun; 41(12):2665-71. PubMed ID: 17451782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of the heterotrophic biomass and the endogenous residue of activated sludge.
Ramdani A; Dold P; Gadbois A; Déléris S; Houweling D; Comeau Y
Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(3):653-68. PubMed ID: 22172563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater--comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment.
González S; Petrovic M; Barceló D
Chemosphere; 2007 Feb; 67(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 17123581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Change in the fouling propensity of sludge in membrane bioreactors (MBR) in relation to the accumulation of biopolymer clusters.
Sun FY; Wang XM; Li XY
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Apr; 102(7):4718-25. PubMed ID: 21316942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates removal in conventional activated sludge systems and membrane bioreactors.
De Wever H; Van Roy S; Dotremont C; Miller J; Knepper T
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 15497851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biodegradation of the endogenous residue of activated sludge.
Ramdani A; Dold P; Déléris S; Lamarre D; Gadbois A; Comeau Y
Water Res; 2010 Apr; 44(7):2179-88. PubMed ID: 20074768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
