251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15900742)
21. Application of Activated Sludge Model No. 1 to biological treatment of pure winery effluents: case studies.
Stricker AE; Racault Y
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 15771107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Development of an integrated membrane process for water reclamation.
Lew CH; Hu JY; Song LF; Lee LY; Ong SL; Ng WJ; Seah H
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):455-63. PubMed ID: 16004008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Model-based optimisation of the biological performance of a sidestream MBR.
Nopens I; Sin G; Jiang T; d'Antonio L; Stama S; Zhao J; Vanrolleghem PA
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):135-43. PubMed ID: 17898452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mixing characterisation of full-scale membrane bioreactors: CFD modelling with experimental validation.
Brannock M; Wang Y; Leslie G
Water Res; 2010 May; 44(10):3181-91. PubMed ID: 20347471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Critical operational parameters for zero sludge production in biological wastewater treatment processes combined with sludge disintegration.
Yoon SH; Lee S
Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(15):3738-54. PubMed ID: 16061269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Membrane bioreactors for winery wastewater treatment: case-studies at full scale.
Guglielmi G; Andreottola G; Foladori P; Ziglio G
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(5):1201-7. PubMed ID: 19717906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Membranebioreactor with external membranes.
Jonkers C; Carrette R; De Lathouwer J; Thoeye C
Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(3a):87-93. PubMed ID: 15954567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of solid retention time on the rheology of MBR sludge.
Giordano C; Pollice A; Laera G; Saturno D; Mininni G
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):151-9. PubMed ID: 17978443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Characterization of sludge structure and activity in submerged membrane bioreactor.
Spérandio M; Masse A; Espinosa-Bouchot MC; Cabassud C
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):401-8. PubMed ID: 16459815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sludge reduction potential of metazoa in membrane bioreactors.
Luxmy BS; Kubo T; Yamamoto K
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(10):197-202. PubMed ID: 11794654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimal sludge retention time for a bench scale MBR treating municipal sewage.
Pollice A; Laera G; Saturno D; Giordano C; Sandulli R
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 18309207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Design and performance of BNR activated sludge systems with flat sheet membranes for solid-liquid separation.
du Toit GJ; Ramphao MC; Parco V; Wentzel MC; Ekama GA
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):105-13. PubMed ID: 17898449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomass growth and activity in a membrane bioreactor with complete sludge retention.
Pollice A; Laera G; Blonda M
Water Res; 2004 Apr; 38(7):1799-808. PubMed ID: 15026234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of complete sludge retention on biomass build-up in a membrane bioreactor.
Pollice A; Laera G
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):369-75. PubMed ID: 16459811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative performance between intermittently cyclic activated sludge-membrane bioreactor and anoxic/aerobic-membrane bioreactor.
Wang YL; Yu SL; Shi WX; Bao RL; Zhao Q; Zuo XT
Bioresour Technol; 2009 Sep; 100(17):3877-81. PubMed ID: 19362820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Occurrence of EPS in activated sludge from a membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater.
Evenblij H; van der Graaf JH
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(12):293-300. PubMed ID: 15686034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time.
Massé A; Spérandio M; Cabassud C
Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2405-15. PubMed ID: 16759682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Consequences of mass transfer effects on the inetics of nitrifiers.
Manser R; Gujer W; Siegrist H
Water Res; 2005 Nov; 39(19):4633-42. PubMed ID: 16290185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Modeling prediction of membrane bioreactor process with the concept of soluble microbial product.
Lu SG; Imai T; Ukita M; Sekine M; Higuchi T
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(11-12):63-9. PubMed ID: 12523734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of sulfonated and other micropollutants removal in membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment.
De Wever H; Weiss S; Reemtsma T; Vereecken J; Müller J; Knepper T; Rörden O; Gonzalez S; Barcelo D; Dolores Hernando M
Water Res; 2007 Feb; 41(4):935-45. PubMed ID: 17207834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
