These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15900922)

  • 1. Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition.
    Criss AH; Shiffrin RM
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Dec; 32(8):1284-97. PubMed ID: 15900922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. List discrimination in associative recognition and implications for representation.
    Criss AH; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1199-212. PubMed ID: 16393040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of stimulus type in list length effects in recognition memory.
    Kinnell A; Dennis S
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):311-25. PubMed ID: 22161208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Paired-associate learning and memory interference in schizophrenia.
    Elvevåg B; Egan MF; Goldberg TE
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(12):1565-75. PubMed ID: 11074079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition.
    Clark SE
    Mem Cognit; 1992 May; 20(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 1508049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strength-based mirror effects in item and associative recognition: evidence for within-list criterion changes.
    Hockley WE; Niewiadomski MW
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jun; 35(4):679-88. PubMed ID: 17848026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinguishing familiarity from fluency for the compound word pair effect in associative recognition.
    Ahmad FN; Hockley WE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1768-1791. PubMed ID: 27415965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interference and the representation of order within associations.
    Rehani M; Caplan JB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jul; 64(7):1409-29. PubMed ID: 21598202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of familiarity in associative recognition of unitized compound word pairs.
    Ahmad FN; Hockley WE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(12):2301-24. PubMed ID: 24873736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Associative recognition and the list strength paradigm.
    Osth AF; Dennis S
    Mem Cognit; 2014 May; 42(4):583-94. PubMed ID: 24317960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Release from output interference in recognition memory: A test of the attention hypothesis.
    Criss AH; Salomão C; Malmberg KJ; Aue W; Kılıç A; Claridge M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 May; 71(5):1081-1089. PubMed ID: 28351212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Categorical and associative relations increase false memory relative to purely associative relations.
    Coane JH; McBride DM; Termonen ML; Cutting JC
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 26250805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ListChecker Pro 1.2: a program designed to facilitate creating word lists using the University of South Florida word association norms.
    Eakin DK
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Nov; 42(4):1012-21. PubMed ID: 21139168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The picture superiority effect in associative recognition.
    Hockley WE
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1351-9. PubMed ID: 18927048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. List length and overlap effects in forced-choice associative recognition.
    Clark SE; Hori A
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jul; 23(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 7666758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the nature of associative information in recognition memory.
    Kelley R; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):701-22. PubMed ID: 11394675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does recognition of single words predict recognition of two?
    Greene RL; Klein AA
    Am J Psychol; 2004; 117(2):215-27. PubMed ID: 15209370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Category length produces an inverted-U discriminability function in episodic recognition memory.
    Neely JH; Tse CS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1141-72. PubMed ID: 19048453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Serial recall, word frequency, and mixed lists: the influence of item arrangement.
    Miller LM; Roodenrys S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1731-40. PubMed ID: 22582964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus type and the list strength paradigm.
    Osth AF; Dennis S; Kinnell A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1826-41. PubMed ID: 24579878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.