These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1590103)
41. Randomized clinical study of the T-Cu 380A and the Lippes loop C, in Campinas, Brazil. Díaz J; Díaz MM; Pastene L; Araki R; Faúndes A Contraception; 1982 Sep; 26(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 6756774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Five years' experience of intrauterine contraception with the Nova-T and the Copper-T-200. Luukkainen T; Allonen H; Nielsen NC; Nygren KG; Pyörälä T Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Dec; 147(8):885-92. PubMed ID: 6650625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. IUDs and PID: a comparative trial of strings versus stringless devices. Potts DM; Champion CB; Kozuh-Novak M; Alvarez-Sanchez F; Santiso-Galvez R; Tacla X; Cohen J; Rivera R Adv Contracept; 1991; 7(2-3):231-40. PubMed ID: 1950721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Efficacy of intrauterine device TCu380A when inserted in four different periods]. Wu SC; Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 44(6):431-5. PubMed ID: 19953943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Two years of intrauterine contraception with levonorgestrel and with copper: a randomized comparison of the TCu 380Ag and levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day devices. Sivin I; Stern J; Diaz J; Diaz MM; Faundes A; el Mahgoub S; Diaz S; Pavez M; Coutinho E; Mattos CE Contraception; 1987 Mar; 35(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 3111785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Clinical experiences with MLCu250 and MLCu375 IUD. Batár I Adv Contracept; 1992 Mar; 8(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 1590104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs. Chi IC Contraception; 1991 Dec; 44(6):573-88. PubMed ID: 1773615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [A random control study of indomethacin-containing MYCu intrauterine contraceptive device for 60 months]. Wang LY; Li SZ; Wu SY; Zhao YH; Wang Y Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 93(7):496-9. PubMed ID: 23660315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs), versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy. French R; Cowan F; Mansour D; Morris S; Hughes D; Robinson A; Proctor T; Summerbell C; Logan S; Guillebaud J Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (2):CD001776. PubMed ID: 11406007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices. Heinemann K; Reed S; Moehner S; Minh TD Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 25601350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Acceptability of an experimental intracervical device: results of a study controlling for selection bias. Shain RN; Ratsula K; Toivonen J; Lähteenmäki P; Luukkainen T; Holden AE; Rosenthal M Contraception; 1989 Jan; 39(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 2491982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Immediate postpartum insertion of a copper-wired intrauterine contraceptive device, the MLCu250. Thiery M; Van Der Pas H; Delbeke L; Van Kets H Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1979 Aug; 86(8):654-8. PubMed ID: 497136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The effect on intrauterine device position and performance of a modified TCu380A insertion technique. Homouda K Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2002 Mar; 7(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 12041862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception. Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. IUDs safe and effective at nine years of continuous use. Prog Hum Reprod Res; 1992; (22):2-3. PubMed ID: 12286011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Performance of copper intrauterine devices when inserted after an expulsion. Bahamondes L; Díaz J; Marchi NM; Petta CA; Cristofoletti ML; Gomez G Hum Reprod; 1995 Nov; 10(11):2917-8. PubMed ID: 8747044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Intrauterine devices. Bilian X Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Apr; 16(2):155-68. PubMed ID: 12041959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A comparative clinical trial of the TCu 380A, Lippes Loop D and Multiload Cu 375 IUDs in Indonesia. Sastrawinata S; Farr G; Prihadi SM; Hutapea H; Anwar M; Wahyudi I; Sunjoto ; Kemara KP; Champion CB; Robbins M Contraception; 1991 Aug; 44(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 1893708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Clinical performance of the TCu 380A and TCu 220C IUDs in four developing country family planning clinics. Farr G; Amatya R; Betancourt JD; David M; Alfonso L; Dacalos E Contraception; 1994 Nov; 50(5):417-29. PubMed ID: 7859451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The safety of intrauterine devices among young women: a systematic review. Jatlaoui TC; Riley HEM; Curtis KM Contraception; 2017 Jan; 95(1):17-39. PubMed ID: 27771475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]