These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15902167)

  • 1. Decreased anal sphincter lacerations associated with restrictive episiotomy use.
    Clemons JL; Towers GD; McClure GB; O'Boyle AL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1620-5. PubMed ID: 15902167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States.
    Fenner DE; Genberg B; Brahma P; Marek L; DeLancey JO
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Dec; 189(6):1543-9; discussion 1549-50. PubMed ID: 14710059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Could a mediolateral episiotomy prevent obstetric anal sphincter injury?
    Revicky V; Nirmal D; Mukhopadhyay S; Morris EP; Nieto JJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Jun; 150(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 20359810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries.
    Benavides L; Wu JM; Hundley AF; Ivester TS; Visco AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1702-6. PubMed ID: 15902181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of mediolateral episiotomy during labour: analysis of risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter tears.
    Aukee P; Sundström H; Kairaluoma MV
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(7):856-60. PubMed ID: 16817086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk factors for primary and subsequent anal sphincter lacerations: a comparison of cohorts by parity and prior mode of delivery.
    Lowder JL; Burrows LJ; Krohn MA; Weber AM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 196(4):344.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17403415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Occiput posterior fetal head position increases the risk of anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted deliveries.
    Wu JM; Williams KS; Hundley AF; Connolly A; Visco AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 193(2):525-8; discussion 528-9. PubMed ID: 16098883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk factors for anal sphincter tear during vaginal delivery.
    Fitzgerald MP; Weber AM; Howden N; Cundiff GW; Brown MB;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 109(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 17197584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy: a bad combination for the perineum.
    Kudish B; Blackwell S; Mcneeley SG; Bujold E; Kruger M; Hendrix SL; Sokol R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):749-54. PubMed ID: 16949408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk factors for anal sphincter tear in multiparas.
    DiPiazza D; Richter HE; Chapman V; Cliver SP; Neely C; Chen CC; Burgio KL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 107(6):1233-7. PubMed ID: 16738146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lateral episiotomy protects primiparous but not multiparous women from obstetric anal sphincter rupture.
    Räisänen SH; Vehviläinen-Julkunen K; Gissler M; Heinonen S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(12):1365-72. PubMed ID: 19852569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.
    Macleod M; Strachan B; Bahl R; Howarth L; Goyder K; Van de Venne M; Murphy DJ
    BJOG; 2008 Dec; 115(13):1688-94. PubMed ID: 19035943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery.
    de Leeuw JW; de Wit C; Kuijken JP; Bruinse HW
    BJOG; 2008 Jan; 115(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 17999693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Third degree perineal tears in a university medical center where midline episiotomies are not performed.
    Sheiner E; Levy A; Walfisch A; Hallak M; Mazor M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Apr; 271(4):307-10. PubMed ID: 15024575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recurrent risk of anal sphincter laceration among women with vaginal deliveries.
    Spydslaug A; Trogstad LI; Skrondal A; Eskild A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Feb; 105(2):307-13. PubMed ID: 15684157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Episiotomy and increase in the risk of obstetric laceration in a subsequent vaginal delivery.
    Alperin M; Krohn MA; Parviainen K
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1274-8. PubMed ID: 18515508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: role of forceps delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy.
    Hudelist G; Gelle'n J; Singer C; Ruecklinger E; Czerwenka K; Kandolf O; Keckstein J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 192(3):875-81. PubMed ID: 15746685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicentre pilot study.
    Murphy DJ; Macleod M; Bahl R; Goyder K; Howarth L; Strachan B
    BJOG; 2008 Dec; 115(13):1695-702; discussion 1702-3. PubMed ID: 19035944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk of recurrence of anal sphincter lacerations.
    Dandolu V; Gaughan JP; Chatwani AJ; Harmanli O; Mabine B; Hernandez E
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):831-5. PubMed ID: 15802413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Defining an at-risk population for obstetric anal sphincter laceration.
    Minaglia SM; Kimata C; Soules KA; Pappas T; Oyama IA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 201(5):526.e1-6. PubMed ID: 19762002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.