These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15902192)

  • 1. Peer review is complicated.
    Goodlin RC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1760. PubMed ID: 15902192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Best practices in publishing and the American Headache Society.
    Sheftell FD
    Headache; 2009 Apr; 49 Suppl 2():S47-8. PubMed ID: 19356159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Guest editorial.
    Berg G
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Jan; 90(1):3. PubMed ID: 21275908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Submitting a manuscript to the ASRT.
    Frosch JR
    Radiol Technol; 2012; 83(3):291-2. PubMed ID: 22267696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ACOG program eases peer review conflicts.
    Koska MT
    Hospitals; 1988 Apr; 62(8):58. PubMed ID: 3350518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Review criteria for research manuscripts.
    Bordage G; Caelleigh AS; Steinecke A; Bland CJ; Crandall SJ; McGaghie WC; Pangaro LN; Penn G; Regehr G; Shea JS;
    Acad Med; 2001 Sep; 76(9):897-978. PubMed ID: 11565558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Editorial: Clarification of the policy on dual publication.
    Mattingly RF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1974 Jul; 44(1):142-3. PubMed ID: 4834808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality filters in medical publications.
    Balasubramanian S; Bhaskar PA
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1984 Nov; 82(11):420-1. PubMed ID: 6399064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing ethical and peer review standards of medical journals.
    Dickens B;
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 May; 133(2):249-50. PubMed ID: 26972183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: relevance for research in clinical neuropsychology.
    Cicchetti DV; Rourke BP; Wass P
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1992 Nov; 14(6):976-80. PubMed ID: 1452641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Asia backs E-Biomed 'with peer review'.
    Saegusa A
    Nature; 1999 Aug; 400(6744):491. PubMed ID: 10448840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Where are monthly research journals?
    Morse JM
    Image J Nurs Sch; 1995; 27(1):6. PubMed ID: 7721320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can journals influence science?
    Maddox J
    Nature; 1989 Jun; 339(6227):657. PubMed ID: 2739710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A century of obstetrics and gynecology as depicted in The Journal of the South Carolina Medical Association.
    Horger EO
    J S C Med Assoc; 2005 Jun; 101(5):137-47. PubMed ID: 16187489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review.
    Roe IL
    Am J Med Technol; 1978 May; 44(5):365. PubMed ID: 677147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Journalistic rights, and wrongs.
    Mason DJ
    Am J Nurs; 1999 Sep; 99(9):7. PubMed ID: 10489568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Publishing in peer-reviewed journals. Fundamentals for new investigators.
    Tipton CM
    Physiologist; 1991 Oct; 34(5):275, 278-9. PubMed ID: 1788353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review.
    Nature; 1989 Jun; 339(6224):414. PubMed ID: 2725672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tales from the dark side of medicine.
    Forster J
    Med Econ; 1998 Oct; 75(20):116, 119-20. PubMed ID: 10186264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.