These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1590291)

  • 1. The influence of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment on brachyfacial and dolichofacial growth patterns.
    Klapper L; Navarro SF; Bowman D; Pawlowski B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 May; 101(5):425-30. PubMed ID: 1590291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on the mandibular position.
    Yamaguchi K; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Nov; 100(5):443-52. PubMed ID: 1951197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of non-extraction orthodontic treatment on the vertical dimension: a comparison of a dolichofacial and a mesofacial group.
    Lin CH; Short LL; Banting DW
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 22866592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of change in arch form with premolar expansion.
    BeGole EA; Fox DL; Sadowsky C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Mar; 113(3):307-15. PubMed ID: 9517723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" Class II patients.
    Paquette DE; Beattie JR; Johnston LE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jul; 102(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 1626523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemisection: one large step toward management of congenitally missing lower second premolars.
    Northway W
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):792-9. PubMed ID: 15673143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mandibular growth and third molar impaction in extraction cases.
    Capelli J
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 1928824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mandibular arch changes following nonextraction treatment.
    Valiathan A; Thomas B
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):68; author reply 68. PubMed ID: 16792247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Arch width changes in extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients.
    Aksu M; Kocadereli I
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):948-52. PubMed ID: 16448236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The incidence of mandibular third molar impactions in different skeletal face types.
    Breik O; Grubor D
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):320-4. PubMed ID: 19133947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extraction vs nonextraction: arch widths and smile esthetics.
    Kim E; Gianelly AA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 12940554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lip curve changes in females with premolar extraction or nonextraction treatment.
    Moseling KP; Woods MG
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Feb; 74(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 15038491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vertical facial and dental arch dimensional changes in extraction vs. non-extraction orthodontic treatment.
    Kumari M; Fida M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Jan; 20(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 20141687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of the cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with nonextraction or with two maxillary premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Simão TM; Barros SE; Janson M; de Freitas MR
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 21490991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Posttreatment changes in different facial types.
    Zaher AR; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(6):425-36. PubMed ID: 7864464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
    Waters D; Harris EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 1: differences between premolar extraction and nonextraction treatment outcomes.
    Meyer AH; Woods MG; Manton DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 24485736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of the Herbst appliance in growing orthodontic patients with different underlying vertical patterns.
    Deen E; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 May; 31(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 26219148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The therapeutic impact of the Begg technic on vertical dimension].
    Méry J; Parguel P; Mauran G
    Orthod Fr; 1989; 60 Pt 2():861-71. PubMed ID: 2490263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.