These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15903116)

  • 1. When context hinders! Learn-test compatibility in face recognition.
    Leder H; Carbon CC
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Feb; 58(2):235-50. PubMed ID: 15903116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Representation of facial expressions of emotion.
    White M
    Am J Psychol; 1999; 112(3):371-81. PubMed ID: 10696270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Face perception in high-functioning autistic adults: evidence for superior processing of face parts, not for a configural face-processing deficit.
    Lahaie A; Mottron L; Arguin M; Berthiaume C; Jemel B; Saumier D
    Neuropsychology; 2006 Jan; 20(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 16460220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does facial processing prioritize change detection?: change blindness illustrates costs and benefits of holistic processing.
    Wilford MM; Wells GL
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Nov; 21(11):1611-5. PubMed ID: 20935169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Cambridge Face Memory Test: results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants.
    Duchaine B; Nakayama K
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):576-85. PubMed ID: 16169565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Specialized face perception mechanisms extract both part and spacing information: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia.
    Yovel G; Duchaine B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):580-93. PubMed ID: 16768361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of parts, wholes, and familiarity on face-selective responses in MEG.
    Harris AM; Aguirre GK
    J Vis; 2008 Aug; 8(10):4.1-12. PubMed ID: 19146346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies.
    Goffaux V; Rossion B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):1023-39. PubMed ID: 16846295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No effect of inversion on attentional and affective processing of facial expressions.
    Lipp OV; Price SM; Tellegen CL
    Emotion; 2009 Apr; 9(2):248-59. PubMed ID: 19348536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Memory conjunction errors for realistic faces are consistent with configural processing.
    McKone E; Peh YX
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 16724776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Holistic processing of faces: perceptual and decisional components.
    Richler JJ; Gauthier I; Wenger MJ; Palmeri TJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):328-42. PubMed ID: 18315409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Processing the socially relevant parts of faces.
    Benuzzi F; Pugnaghi M; Meletti S; Lui F; Serafini M; Baraldi P; Nichelli P
    Brain Res Bull; 2007 Oct; 74(5):344-56. PubMed ID: 17845909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Face-specific configural processing of relational information.
    Leder H; Carbon CC
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):19-29. PubMed ID: 16464285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revisiting the role of spatial frequencies in the holistic processing of faces.
    Cheung OS; Richler JJ; Palmeri TJ; Gauthier I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1327-36. PubMed ID: 19045978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The representation of parts and wholes in face-selective cortex.
    Harris A; Aguirre GK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 May; 20(5):863-78. PubMed ID: 18201134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Humans and macaques employ similar face-processing strategies.
    Dahl CD; Wallraven C; Bülthoff HH; Logothetis NK
    Curr Biol; 2009 Mar; 19(6):509-13. PubMed ID: 19249210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of human chimeric faces by chimpanzees: evidence for a right hemisphere advantage.
    Morris RD; Hopkins WD
    Brain Cogn; 1993 Jan; 21(1):111-22. PubMed ID: 8424859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The recognition of emotional expression in prosopagnosia: decoding whole and part faces.
    Stephan BC; Breen N; Caine D
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2006 Nov; 12(6):884-95. PubMed ID: 17064450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why does selective attention to parts fail in face processing?
    Richler JJ; Tanaka JW; Brown DD; Gauthier I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1356-68. PubMed ID: 18980400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Turning configural processing upside down: part and whole body postures.
    Reed CL; Stone VE; Grubb JD; McGoldrick JE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):73-87. PubMed ID: 16478327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.