BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15903203)

  • 1. Combined tuning fork tests in hearing loss: explorative clinical study of the patterns.
    Vikram KB; Naseeruddin K
    J Otolaryngol; 2004 Aug; 33(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 15903203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of the Weber and Rinne tuning fork tests in evaluation of children with otitis media with effusion.
    Behn A; Westerberg BD; Zhang H; Riding KH; Ludemann JP; Kozak FK
    J Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 17942032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical utility of the 512-Hz Rinne tuning fork test.
    Burkey JM; Lippy WH; Schuring AG; Rizer FM
    Am J Otol; 1998 Jan; 19(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 9455950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. C1-tuning fork tests in school-aged children.
    Haapaniemi JJ; Suonpää JT; Salmivalli AJ; Virolainen ES
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1996; 23():26-32. PubMed ID: 8809320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The importance of tuning forks].
    Reiss M; Reiss G
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2002 Jan; 91(1-2):17-9. PubMed ID: 11824141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rinne revisited: steel versus aluminum tuning forks.
    MacKechnie CA; Greenberg JJ; Gerkin RC; McCall AA; Hirsch BE; Durrant JD; Raz Y
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):907-13. PubMed ID: 24085711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Rinne tuning fork test.
    Swan IR
    Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1989 Sep; 24(9A):99-102. PubMed ID: 2506208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The validity of tuning fork tests in diagnosing hearing loss.
    Miltenburg DM
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 7996624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Rinne test for conductive deafness. A critical reappraisal.
    Chole RA; Cook GB
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1988 Apr; 114(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 3348896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical accuracy of tuning fork tests.
    Stankiewicz JA; Mowry HJ
    Laryngoscope; 1979 Dec; 89(12):1956-63. PubMed ID: 513917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Bing test in the detection of conductive hearing impairment.
    Swan IR; Browning GG
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1989 Dec; 14(6):539-43. PubMed ID: 2692884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new modification of the Rinne test.
    Johnston DF
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1992 Aug; 17(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 1526051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Physical diagnostic procedures: whispered speech and tuning fork test].
    Grote JJ; de Laat JA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Aug; 142(32):1816-9. PubMed ID: 9856153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patterns of hearing loss in tympanic membrane perforation resulting from physical blow to the ear: a prospective controlled cohort study.
    Orji FT; Agu CC
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):526-32. PubMed ID: 20070761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contralateral occlusion test: The effect of external ear canal occlusion on predicting conductive hearing loss.
    Roque Reis L; Castelhano L; Correia F; Escada P
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2020; 71(4):235-241. PubMed ID: 31898962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Observations on the Rinne test.
    Haughton PM; Pearce JM
    Lancet; 1982 Apr; 1(8276):829-30. PubMed ID: 6122058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The otologist's tuning fork examination--are you striking it correctly?
    Stevens JR; Pfannenstiel TJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Mar; 152(3):477-9. PubMed ID: 25475500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Tuning fork study in deafness. Thus function Rinne and Weber tests].
    Ziemer C
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Apr; 148(15):18. PubMed ID: 16711196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.