These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15903203)

  • 1. Combined tuning fork tests in hearing loss: explorative clinical study of the patterns.
    Vikram KB; Naseeruddin K
    J Otolaryngol; 2004 Aug; 33(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 15903203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of the Weber and Rinne tuning fork tests in evaluation of children with otitis media with effusion.
    Behn A; Westerberg BD; Zhang H; Riding KH; Ludemann JP; Kozak FK
    J Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 17942032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical utility of the 512-Hz Rinne tuning fork test.
    Burkey JM; Lippy WH; Schuring AG; Rizer FM
    Am J Otol; 1998 Jan; 19(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 9455950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. C1-tuning fork tests in school-aged children.
    Haapaniemi JJ; Suonpää JT; Salmivalli AJ; Virolainen ES
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1996; 23():26-32. PubMed ID: 8809320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The importance of tuning forks].
    Reiss M; Reiss G
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2002 Jan; 91(1-2):17-9. PubMed ID: 11824141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rinne revisited: steel versus aluminum tuning forks.
    MacKechnie CA; Greenberg JJ; Gerkin RC; McCall AA; Hirsch BE; Durrant JD; Raz Y
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):907-13. PubMed ID: 24085711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Rinne tuning fork test.
    Swan IR
    Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1989 Sep; 24(9A):99-102. PubMed ID: 2506208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The validity of tuning fork tests in diagnosing hearing loss.
    Miltenburg DM
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 7996624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Rinne test for conductive deafness. A critical reappraisal.
    Chole RA; Cook GB
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1988 Apr; 114(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 3348896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical accuracy of tuning fork tests.
    Stankiewicz JA; Mowry HJ
    Laryngoscope; 1979 Dec; 89(12):1956-63. PubMed ID: 513917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Bing test in the detection of conductive hearing impairment.
    Swan IR; Browning GG
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1989 Dec; 14(6):539-43. PubMed ID: 2692884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new modification of the Rinne test.
    Johnston DF
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1992 Aug; 17(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 1526051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Physical diagnostic procedures: whispered speech and tuning fork test].
    Grote JJ; de Laat JA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Aug; 142(32):1816-9. PubMed ID: 9856153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patterns of hearing loss in tympanic membrane perforation resulting from physical blow to the ear: a prospective controlled cohort study.
    Orji FT; Agu CC
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):526-32. PubMed ID: 20070761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contralateral occlusion test: The effect of external ear canal occlusion on predicting conductive hearing loss.
    Roque Reis L; Castelhano L; Correia F; Escada P
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2020; 71(4):235-241. PubMed ID: 31898962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Observations on the Rinne test.
    Haughton PM; Pearce JM
    Lancet; 1982 Apr; 1(8276):829-30. PubMed ID: 6122058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The otologist's tuning fork examination--are you striking it correctly?
    Stevens JR; Pfannenstiel TJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Mar; 152(3):477-9. PubMed ID: 25475500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Tuning fork study in deafness. Thus function Rinne and Weber tests].
    Ziemer C
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Apr; 148(15):18. PubMed ID: 16711196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.