BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

552 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15903459)

  • 1. Nonequilibrium model for estimating parameters of deleterious mutations.
    Gordo I; Dionisio F
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):031907. PubMed ID: 15903459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evolutionary dynamics of the most populated genotype on rugged fitness landscapes.
    Jain K
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2007 Sep; 76(3 Pt 1):031922. PubMed ID: 17930286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Causes of natural variation in fitness: evidence from studies of Drosophila populations.
    Charlesworth B
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Feb; 112(6):1662-9. PubMed ID: 25572964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mutation and selection in a large population.
    Peck JR; Waxman D; Cruikshank A
    Biosystems; 2004; 74(1-3):15-27. PubMed ID: 15125990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Population dynamics with and without selection.
    Pekalski A; Sznajd-Weron K
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2001 Mar; 63(3 Pt 1):031903. PubMed ID: 11308674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Small world effects in evolution.
    Bagnoli F; Bezzi M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2001 Aug; 64(2 Pt 1):021914. PubMed ID: 11497627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SelSim: a program to simulate population genetic data with natural selection and recombination.
    Spencer CC; Coop G
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 20(18):3673-5. PubMed ID: 15271777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolutionary game dynamics in finite populations with strong selection and weak mutation.
    Fudenberg D; Nowak MA; Taylor C; Imhof LA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Nov; 70(3):352-63. PubMed ID: 16987535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evolution of evolvability via adaptation of mutation rates.
    Bedau MA; Packard NH
    Biosystems; 2003 May; 69(2-3):143-62. PubMed ID: 12689727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Population dynamics in the Penna model.
    Coe JB; Mao Y
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Apr; 69(4 Pt 1):041907. PubMed ID: 15169043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The population genetics of adaptation on correlated fitness landscapes: the block model.
    Orr HA
    Evolution; 2006 Jun; 60(6):1113-24. PubMed ID: 16892963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coevolutionary dynamics: from finite to infinite populations.
    Traulsen A; Claussen JC; Hauert C
    Phys Rev Lett; 2005 Dec; 95(23):238701. PubMed ID: 16384353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The adaptation rate of asexuals: deleterious mutations, clonal interference and population bottlenecks.
    Campos PR; Wahl LM
    Evolution; 2010 Jul; 64(7):1973-83. PubMed ID: 20199567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anomalies and the Eve effect in the asexual Penna model.
    Preece T; Mao Y
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2006 Nov; 74(5 Pt 1):051915. PubMed ID: 17279947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Limits to adaptation in asexual populations.
    de Visser JA; Rozen DE
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):779-88. PubMed ID: 16033549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamics of competing species in a model of adaptive radiation and macroevolution.
    De Blasio BF; De Blasio FV
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Sep; 72(3 Pt 1):031916. PubMed ID: 16241491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evolution of complex dynamics.
    Wilds R; Kauffman SA; Glass L
    Chaos; 2008 Sep; 18(3):033109. PubMed ID: 19045447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overdominance interacts with linkage to determine the rate of adaptation to a new optimum.
    Draghi J; Whitlock MC
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Jan; 28(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 25393682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between stochastic and deterministic selection-mutation models.
    Ackleh AS; Hu S
    Math Biosci Eng; 2007 Apr; 4(2):133-57. PubMed ID: 17658920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deterministic and stochastic regimes of asexual evolution on rugged fitness landscapes.
    Jain K; Krug J
    Genetics; 2007 Mar; 175(3):1275-88. PubMed ID: 17179085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.