228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15904442)
1. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix at each trimester in normal pregnant women.
Ozdemir I; Demirci F; Yucel O
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 15904442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transvaginal versus transperineal ultrasonography: a blinded comparison in the assessment of cervical length at midgestation.
Kurtzman JT; Goldsmith LJ; Gall SA; Spinnato JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Oct; 179(4):852-7. PubMed ID: 9790358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal-translabial ultrasonography.
Cicero S; Skentou C; Souka A; To MS; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 17(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 11339192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation of uterine cervical length measurement from transabdominal, transperineal and transvaginal ultrasonography.
Raungrongmorakot K; Tanmoun N; Ruangvutilert P; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Tontisirin P; Butsansee W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Mar; 87(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 15117051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transperineal versus endovaginal ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in the midtrimester: a blinded comparison.
Owen J; Neely C; Northen A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 181(4):780-3. PubMed ID: 10521728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transperineal versus transvaginal sonographic cervical length measurement in second- and third-trimester pregnancies.
Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 32(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 18816491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix: transperineal versus endovaginal imaging.
Hertzberg BS; Livingston E; DeLong DM; McNally PJ; Fazekas CK; Kliewer MA
J Ultrasound Med; 2001 Oct; 20(10):1071-8; quiz 1080. PubMed ID: 11587014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transabdominal scanning of the cervix at the 20-week morphology scan: comparison with transvaginal cervical measurements in a healthy nulliparous population.
Stone PR; Chan EH; McCowan LM; Taylor RS; Mitchell JM;
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Dec; 50(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 21133862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of transperineal and transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm delivery.
Yazici G; Yildiz A; Tiras MB; Arslan M; Kanik A; Oz U
J Clin Ultrasound; 2004 Jun; 32(5):225-30. PubMed ID: 15124188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of prolonged pregnancy in nulliparous women by transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length at 20-24 weeks and 37 weeks.
Suh YH; Park KH; Hong JS; Noh JH
J Korean Med Sci; 2007 Feb; 22(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 17297257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sonographic cervical length measurement in pregnant women with a cervical pessary.
Goya M; Pratcorona L; Higueras T; Perez-Hoyos S; Carreras E; Cabero L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 21305638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The significance of transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix in women treated with emergency cerclage.
Guzman ER; Houlihan C; Vintzileos A; Ivan J; Benito C; Kappy K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Aug; 175(2):471-6. PubMed ID: 8765271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical length at 11-14 weeks' and 22-24 weeks' gestation evaluated by transvaginal sonography, and gestational age at delivery.
Carvalho MH; Bittar RE; Brizot ML; Maganha PP; Borges da Fonseca ES; Zugaib M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 21(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 12601833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasonography for cervical length measurement: agreement between transvaginal and translabial techniques.
Carr DB; Smith K; Parsons L; Chansky K; Shields LE
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 96(4):554-8. PubMed ID: 11004358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reference data representative of normal findings at two-dimensional and three-dimensional gray-scale ultrasound examination of the cervix from 17 to 41 weeks' gestation.
Rovas L; Sladkevicius P; Strobel E; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 16388513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasound cervical length measurement and preterm labor.
Gauthier T; Marin B; Garuchet-Bigot A; Kanoun D; Catalan C; Caly H; Eyraud JL; Aubard Y
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 24728104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of threatened preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length.
Murakawa H; Utumi T; Hasegawa I; Tanaka K; Fuzimori R
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Nov; 82(5):829-32. PubMed ID: 8414332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Transperineal ultrasound to measure cervical length of pregnant women in general and in particular with cervical insufficiency - a comparison of transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound as alternatives to transvaginal ultrasound].
Larscheid P; Maass N; Kennes LN; Najjari L
Ultraschall Med; 2015 Feb; 36(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 24327472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging vs. transvaginal ultrasound for cervical length assessment in the second half of pregnancy.
Brandão RS; Pires CR; de Souza E; Avanza LL; Mattar R; Araujo Júnior E; Nardozza LM; Moron AF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Apr; 36(4):571-5. PubMed ID: 20350684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does cervical length at 13-15 weeks' gestation predict preterm delivery in an unselected population?
Conoscenti G; Meir YJ; D'Ottavio G; Rustico MA; Pinzano R; Fischer-Tamaro L; Stampalija T; Natale R; Maso G; Mandruzzato G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 21(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12601832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
