1129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15904592)
1. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes.
Sarmini OR; Lefholz K; Froeschke HP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 15904614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative analysis of different laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures.
Hobson DT; Imudia AN; Al-Safi ZA; Shade G; Kruger M; Diamond MP; Awonuga AO
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 May; 285(5):1353-61. PubMed ID: 22124531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without lymph node dissection for uterine neoplasia.
O'Hanlan KA; Pinto RA; O'Holleran M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(4):449-52. PubMed ID: 17630162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial.
Mourits MJ; Bijen CB; Arts HJ; ter Brugge HG; van der Sijde R; Paulsen L; Wijma J; Bongers MY; Post WJ; van der Zee AG; de Bock GH
Lancet Oncol; 2010 Aug; 11(8):763-71. PubMed ID: 20638901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Supracervical vs. assisted vaginal.
Schwartz RO
J Reprod Med; 1994 Aug; 39(8):625-30. PubMed ID: 7996527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.
Schindlbeck C; Klauser K; Dian D; Janni W; Friese K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Apr; 277(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 17938945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomies.
Hur HC; Guido RS; Mansuria SM; Hacker MR; Sanfilippo JS; Lee TT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 17478361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intramyometrial injection of vasopressin in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.
Ghomi A; Makhlouf F; Kasturi S; Einarsson JI
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 18312990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Hohl instrument for optimizing total laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures.
Mueller A; Oppelt P; Ackermann S; Binder H; Beckmann MW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(5):432-5. PubMed ID: 16213430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy in the management of menorrhagia: 400 consecutive cases.
Erian J; Hassan M; Pachydakis A; Chandakas S; Wissa I; Hill N
BJOG; 2008 May; 115(6):742-8. PubMed ID: 18410659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. abdominal hysterectomy in a community hospital. A cost comparison.
Simon NV; Laveran RL; Cavanaugh S; Gerlach DH; Jackson JR
J Reprod Med; 1999 Apr; 44(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 10319303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perioperative complication rate in 1706 patients after a standardized laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy technique.
Bojahr B; Raatz D; Schonleber G; Abri C; Ohlinger R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 16698522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uteri.
Alperin M; Kivnick S; Poon KY
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(6):689-94. PubMed ID: 23084671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. No difference in length of hospital stay between laparoscopic and abdominal supravaginal hysterectomy--a preliminary study.
Oscarsson U; Poromaa IS; Nüssler E; Löfgren M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):682-7. PubMed ID: 16752259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer.
Kuoppala T; Tomás E; Heinonen PK
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jul; 270(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12728326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uterine weight as a predictor of morbidity after a benign abdominal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Bonilla DJ; Mains L; Whitaker R; Crawford B; Finan M; Magnus M
J Reprod Med; 2007 Jun; 52(6):490-8. PubMed ID: 17694966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes.
Yim GW; Jung YW; Paek J; Lee SH; Kwon HY; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim JH; Kim YT; Kim SW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 203(1):26.e1-6. PubMed ID: 20417481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 11733973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy in endometrial cancer: surgical and survival outcomes.
Fader AN; Michener CM; Frasure HE; Giannios N; Belinson JL; Zanotti KM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 19423064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
