These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Effect of posts on the fracture resistance of load-cycled endodontically-treated premolars restored with direct composite resin. Hajizadeh H; Namazikhah MS; Moghaddas MJ; Ghavamnasiri M; Majidinia S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):10-7. PubMed ID: 19430621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of box preparation on the strength of glass fiber-reinforced composite inlay-retained fixed partial dentures. Ozcan M; Breuklander MH; Vallittu PK J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):337-45. PubMed ID: 15798684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Sengun A; Cobankara FK; Orucoglu H Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18352927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques. Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth. Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite. Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode. Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of fatigue resistance of three materials for cusp-replacing adhesive restorations. Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters FJ; Verdonschot N; Creugers NH J Dent; 2006 Jan; 34(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15935540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of three composite fiber insertion techniques on fracture resistance of root-filled teeth. Oskoee PA; Ajami AA; Navimipour EJ; Oskoee SS; Sadjadi J J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):413-6. PubMed ID: 19249607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage. Xie KX; Wang XY; Gao XJ; Yuan CY; Li JX; Chu CH Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations. Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]