287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15904700)
1. In vitro fracture resistance of fiber reinforced cusp-replacing composite restorations.
Fennis WM; Tezvergil A; Kuijs RH; Lassila LV; Kreulen CM; Creugers NH; Vallittu PK
Dent Mater; 2005 Jun; 21(6):565-72. PubMed ID: 15904700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Direct restoration of severely damaged incisors using short fiber-reinforced composite resin.
Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
J Dent; 2007 Sep; 35(9):731-6. PubMed ID: 17614187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of posts on the fracture resistance of load-cycled endodontically-treated premolars restored with direct composite resin.
Hajizadeh H; Namazikhah MS; Moghaddas MJ; Ghavamnasiri M; Majidinia S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):10-7. PubMed ID: 19430621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of box preparation on the strength of glass fiber-reinforced composite inlay-retained fixed partial dentures.
Ozcan M; Breuklander MH; Vallittu PK
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):337-45. PubMed ID: 15798684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
Sengun A; Cobankara FK; Orucoglu H
Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18352927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture behavior of structurally compromised non-vital maxillary premolars restored using experimental fiber reinforced composite crowns.
Fokkinga WA; Kreulen CM; Le Bell-Rönnlöf AM; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK; Creugers NH
Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):326-32. PubMed ID: 17212072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of load-bearing capacity of direct resin-bonded fiber-reinforced composite FPDs with four framework designs.
Xie Q; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
J Dent; 2007 Jul; 35(7):578-82. PubMed ID: 17513033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fatigue resistance of teeth restored with cuspal-coverage composite restorations.
Fennis WM; Kuijs RH; Kreulen CM; Verdonschot N; Creugers NH
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 15237878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G
Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of fatigue resistance of three materials for cusp-replacing adhesive restorations.
Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters FJ; Verdonschot N; Creugers NH
J Dent; 2006 Jan; 34(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15935540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of three composite fiber insertion techniques on fracture resistance of root-filled teeth.
Oskoee PA; Ajami AA; Navimipour EJ; Oskoee SS; Sadjadi J
J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):413-6. PubMed ID: 19249607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage.
Xie KX; Wang XY; Gao XJ; Yuan CY; Li JX; Chu CH
Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth restored with glass fibre bundles.
Rodrigues FB; Paranhos MP; Spohr AM; Oshima HM; Carlini B; Burnett LH
Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):356-62. PubMed ID: 20518927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thickness of CAD-CAM composite resin overlays influences fatigue resistance of endodontically treated premolars.
Magne P; Knezevic A
Dent Mater; 2009 Oct; 25(10):1264-8. PubMed ID: 19539358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
