83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15905288)
1. Investigation of staff and patients' opinions of a proposed trial of elective single embryo transfer.
Porter M; Bhattacharya S
Hum Reprod; 2005 Sep; 20(9):2523-30. PubMed ID: 15905288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient attitudes towards twin pregnancies and single embryo transfer - a questionnaire study.
Højgaard A; Ottosen LD; Kesmodel U; Ingerslev HJ
Hum Reprod; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2673-8. PubMed ID: 17766921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey.
van Peperstraten AM; Hermens RP; Nelen WL; Stalmeier PF; Scheffer GJ; Grol RP; Kremer JA
Hum Reprod; 2008 Dec; 23(12):2718-23. PubMed ID: 18775886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors affecting patients' attitudes toward single- and multiple-embryo transfer.
Newton CR; McBride J; Feyles V; Tekpetey F; Power S
Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):269-78. PubMed ID: 17097648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
van Montfoort AP; Fiddelers AA; Janssen JM; Derhaag JG; Dirksen CD; Dunselman GA; Land JA; Geraedts JP; Evers JL; Dumoulin JC
Hum Reprod; 2006 Feb; 21(2):338-43. PubMed ID: 16253973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attitudes towards single embryo transfer, twin and higher order pregnancies in patients undergoing infertility treatment: a review.
Leese B; Denton J
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2010 Mar; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 20141337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Elective single embryo transfer: a justified policy for selected patients].
Giorgetti C; Chabert-Orsini V; Barry B; Chinchole JM; Franquebalme JP; Hans E; Glowaczower E; Terriou P; Sitri MC; Salzmann J; Thibault MC; Roulier R
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Apr; 34(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 16603403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can an educational DVD improve the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer? A randomized controlled study.
Hope N; Rombauts L
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jul; 94(2):489-95. PubMed ID: 19442970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized comparison of alternative methods of information provision on the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer.
Murray S; Shetty A; Rattray A; Taylor V; Bhattacharya S
Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):911-6. PubMed ID: 14990543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Why don't we perform elective single embryo transfer? A qualitative study among IVF patients and professionals.
van Peperstraten AM; Nelen WL; Hermens RP; Jansen L; Scheenjes E; Braat DD; Grol RP; Kremer JA
Hum Reprod; 2008 Sep; 23(9):2036-42. PubMed ID: 18565969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention.
Pinborg A
Hum Reprod Update; 2005; 11(6):575-93. PubMed ID: 16123055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. During IVF treatment patient preference shifts from singletons towards twins but only a few patients show an actual reversal of preference.
Fiddelers AA; Nieman FH; Dumoulin JC; van Montfoort AP; Land JA; Evers JL; Severens JL; Dirksen CD
Hum Reprod; 2011 Aug; 26(8):2092-100. PubMed ID: 21546387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Redefining success in the context of elective single embryo transfer: evidence, intuition and financial reality.
Bhattacharya S; Templeton A
Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1939-42. PubMed ID: 15217994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attitudes of German infertile couples towards multiple births and elective embryo transfer.
Borkenhagen A; Brähler E; Kentenich H
Hum Reprod; 2007 Nov; 22(11):2883-7. PubMed ID: 17898085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determinants of the choice for single or double embryo transfer in twin prone couples.
Van Peperstraten AM; Kreuwel IA; Hermens RP; Nelen WL; Van Dop PA; Grol RP; Kremer JA
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 18231893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What about the remaining twins since single-embryo transfer? How far can (should) we go?
De Neubourg D; Gerris J
Hum Reprod; 2006 Apr; 21(4):843-6. PubMed ID: 16410338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of using an echogenic catheter for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer in an IVF programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.
Coroleu B; Barri PN; Carreras O; Belil I; Buxaderas R; Veiga A; Balasch J
Hum Reprod; 2006 Jul; 21(7):1809-15. PubMed ID: 16556674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Elective single blastocyst transfer reduces twin rates without compromising pregnancy rates.
Criniti A; Thyer A; Chow G; Lin P; Klein N; Soules M
Fertil Steril; 2005 Dec; 84(6):1613-9. PubMed ID: 16359954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Elective transfer of single fresh blastocysts and later transfer of cryostored blastocysts reduces the twin pregnancy rate and can improve the in vitro fertilization live birth rate in younger women.
Henman M; Catt JW; Wood T; Bowman MC; de Boer KA; Jansen RP
Fertil Steril; 2005 Dec; 84(6):1620-7. PubMed ID: 16359955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The psychological impact of mild ovarian stimulation combined with single embryo transfer compared with conventional IVF.
de Klerk C; Heijnen EM; Macklon NS; Duivenvoorden HJ; Fauser BC; Passchier J; Hunfeld JA
Hum Reprod; 2006 Mar; 21(3):721-7. PubMed ID: 16311295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
