458 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15906838)
1. Validation of body fat measurement by skinfolds and two bioelectric impedance methods with DEXA--the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study [CURES-3].
Vasudev S; Mohan A; Mohan D; Farooq S; Raj D; Mohan V
J Assoc Physicians India; 2004 Nov; 52():877-81. PubMed ID: 15906838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The validity of predicted body fat percentage from body mass index and from impedance in samples of five European populations.
Deurenberg P; Andreoli A; Borg P; Kukkonen-Harjula K; de Lorenzo A; van Marken Lichtenbelt WD; Testolin G; Vigano R; Vollaard N
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2001 Nov; 55(11):973-9. PubMed ID: 11641746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Body fat measurement in Indian men: comparison of three methods based on a two-compartment model.
Bhat DS; Yajnik CS; Sayyad MG; Raut KN; Lubree HG; Rege SS; Chougule SD; Shetty PS; Yudkin JS; Kurpad AV
Int J Obes (Lond); 2005 Jul; 29(7):842-8. PubMed ID: 15824749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The use of bioimpedance analysis for the assessment of relative body fat in obese women].
Vsetulová E; Bunc V
Cas Lek Cesk; 2004; 143(8):528-32. PubMed ID: 15446457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of nutritional status in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: whole-body bioimpedance vs body mass index, skinfolds, and leg-to-leg bioimpedance.
Hollander FM; De Roos NM; De Vries JH; Van Berkhout FT
J Am Diet Assoc; 2005 Apr; 105(4):549-55. PubMed ID: 15800555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of various methods of body fat analysis in overweight and obese women].
Verovská R; Lacnák Z; Haluzíková D; Fábin P; Hájek P; Horák L; Haluzík M; Svacina S; Matoulek M
Vnitr Lek; 2009 May; 55(5):455-61. PubMed ID: 19514610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry as a method of measurement of body fat.
Pritchard JE; Nowson CA; Strauss BJ; Carlson JS; Kaymakci B; Wark JD
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1993 Mar; 47(3):216-28. PubMed ID: 8458318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of skinfold thickness and hand-held impedance measurements for estimation of body fat percentage among Singaporean Chinese, Malay and Indian subjects.
Deurenberg P; Deurenberg-Yap M
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2002; 11(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11890632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of human body composition using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis.
Bolanowski M; Nilsson BE
Med Sci Monit; 2001; 7(5):1029-33. PubMed ID: 11535954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does body mass index reflect adequately the body fat content in perimenopausal women?
Kontogianni MD; Panagiotakos DB; Skopouli FN
Maturitas; 2005 Jul; 51(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 15978975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of body build on estimates of body composition from anthropometric measurements in premenopausal women.
Rutishauser IH; Pasco JA; Wheeler CE
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1995 Apr; 49(4):248-55. PubMed ID: 7796782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing body composition among 3- to 8-year-old children: anthropometry, BIA, and DXA.
Eisenmann JC; Heelan KA; Welk GJ
Obes Res; 2004 Oct; 12(10):1633-40. PubMed ID: 15536227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do skinfolds accurately assess changes in body fat in obese children and adolescents?
Watts K; Naylor LH; Davis EA; Jones TW; Beeson B; Bettenay F; Siafarikas A; Bell L; Ackland T; Green DJ
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2006 Mar; 38(3):439-44. PubMed ID: 16540830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of three bioelectrical impedance methods with DXA in overweight and obese men.
Pateyjohns IR; Brinkworth GD; Buckley JD; Noakes M; Clifton PM
Obesity (Silver Spring); 2006 Nov; 14(11):2064-70. PubMed ID: 17135624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of visceral fat area in Japanese adults: proposal of prediction method applicable in a field setting.
Demura S; Sato S
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2007 Jun; 61(6):727-35. PubMed ID: 17180157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [An anthropometric equation for the determination of the percentage of body fat in young men from the Canarian population].
López Calbet JA; Armengol Ramos O; Chavarren Cabrero J; Dorado García C
Med Clin (Barc); 1997 Feb; 108(6):207-13. PubMed ID: 9102485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative analysis of body composition assessment methods in healthy adult men].
Barrera MG; Salazar G; Gajardo H; Gattás V; Coward A
Rev Med Chil; 1997 Nov; 125(11):1335-42. PubMed ID: 9609055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of body composition by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, skinfold thickness and creatinine kinetics in chronic kidney disease patients.
Avesani CM; Draibe SA; Kamimura MA; Cendoroglo M; Pedrosa A; Castro ML; Cuppari L
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2004 Sep; 19(9):2289-95. PubMed ID: 15252158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of hand-to-hand bioimpedance and anthropometry equations versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of body fat percentage in 17-18-year-old conscripts.
Lintsi M; Kaarma H; Kull I
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2004 Mar; 24(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 15056180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Body composition analysis by leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in non-obese and obese individuals.
Boneva-Asiova Z; Boyanov MA
Diabetes Obes Metab; 2008 Nov; 10(11):1012-8. PubMed ID: 18435776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
