These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15907432)

  • 1. Influence of data acquisition environment on accuracy of acoustic voice quality measurements.
    Deliyski DD; Evans MK; Shaw HS
    J Voice; 2005 Jun; 19(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 15907432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regression tree approach to studying factors influencing acoustic voice analysis.
    Deliyski DD; Shaw HS; Evans MK; Vesselinov R
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2006; 58(4):274-88. PubMed ID: 16825780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of sampling rate on accuracy and reliability of acoustic voice analysis.
    Deliyski DD; Shaw HS; Evans MK
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2005; 30(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 16147224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adverse effects of environmental noise on acoustic voice quality measurements.
    Deliyski DD; Shaw HS; Evans MK
    J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 15766847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliable jitter and shimmer measurements in voice clinics: the relevance of vowel, gender, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency effects in a typical clinical task.
    Brockmann M; Drinnan MJ; Storck C; Carding PN
    J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20381308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between VHI scores and specific acoustic measures of mildly disordered voice production.
    Wheeler KM; Collins SP; Sapienza CM
    J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):308-17. PubMed ID: 16126368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Voice loudness and gender effects on jitter and shimmer in healthy adults.
    Brockmann M; Storck C; Carding PN; Drinnan MJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1152-60. PubMed ID: 18664710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements.
    Dejonckere PH; Remacle M; Fresnel-Elbaz E; Woisard V; Crevier-Buchman L; Millet B
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1996; 117(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 9102729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic fidelity of internet bandwidths for measures used in speech and voice disorders.
    Xue SA; Lower A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1366-76. PubMed ID: 20815471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual and acoustic characteristics of voice changes in reflux laryngitis patients.
    Pribuisiene R; Uloza V; Kupcinskas L; Jonaitis L
    J Voice; 2006 Mar; 20(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 15925484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The effect of tobacco consumption on acoustic voice analysis].
    Damborenea Tajada J; Fernández Liesa R; Llorente Arenas E; Naya Gálvez MJ; Marín Garrido C; Rueda Gormedino P; Ortiz García A
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1999; 50(6):448-52. PubMed ID: 10502696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perturbation measures of voice: a comparative study between Multi-Dimensional Voice Program and Praat.
    Maryn Y; Corthals P; De Bodt M; Van Cauwenberge P; Deliyski D
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(4):217-26. PubMed ID: 19590221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The voice handicap index: correlation between subjective patient response and quantitative assessment of voice.
    Woisard V; Bodin S; Yardeni E; Puech M
    J Voice; 2007 Sep; 21(5):623-31. PubMed ID: 16887329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combined Use of Standard and Throat Microphones for Measurement of Acoustic Voice Parameters and Voice Categorization.
    Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Uloziene I; Saferis V; Verikas A
    J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 25795349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laryngostroboscopic, acoustic, and environmental characteristics of high-risk vocal performers.
    Hoffman-Ruddy B; Lehman J; Crandell C; Ingram D; Sapienza C
    J Voice; 2001 Dec; 15(4):543-52. PubMed ID: 11792030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Birth control pills and nonprofessional voice: acoustic analyses.
    Amir O; Biron-Shental T; Shabtai E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 49(5):1114-26. PubMed ID: 17077219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic value of voice acoustic analysis in assessment of occupational voice pathologies in teachers.
    Niebudek-Bogusz E; Fiszer M; Kotylo P; Sliwinska-Kowalska M
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(3):100-6. PubMed ID: 16966152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Applicability of voice acoustic analysis with vocal loading testto diagnostics of occupational voice diseases].
    Niebudek-Bogusz E; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Med Pr; 2006; 57(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 17533986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectral analysis of the voice in Down Syndrome.
    Albertini G; Bonassi S; Dall'Armi V; Giachetti I; Giaquinto S; Mignano M
    Res Dev Disabil; 2010; 31(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 20488659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reliability and sensitivity to change of acoustic measures of voice quality.
    Carding PN; Steen IN; Webb A; MacKenzie K; Deary IJ; Wilson JA
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 2004 Oct; 29(5):538-44. PubMed ID: 15373870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.