These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15908064)

  • 1. Identifying optimal agricultural countermeasure strategies for a hypothetical contamination scenario using the strategy model.
    Cox G; Beresford NA; Alvarez-Farizo B; Oughton D; Kis Z; Eged K; Thørring H; Hunt J; Wright S; Barnett CL; Gil JM; Howard BJ; Crout NM
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):383-97. PubMed ID: 15908064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Costs and practicability of clean feeding of dairy cattle during radioactive contamination of grasslands.
    Rantavaara A; Karhula T; Puurunen M; Lampinen K; Taulavuori T
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):399-414. PubMed ID: 15922495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The STRATEGY project: decision tools to aid sustainable restoration and long-term management of contaminated agricultural ecosystems.
    Howard BJ; Beresford NA; Nisbet A; Cox G; Oughton DH; Hunt J; Alvarez B; Andersson KG; Liland A; Voigt G
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):275-95. PubMed ID: 15905001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stakeholder involvement facilitates decision making for UK nuclear accident recovery.
    Alexander C; Burt R; Nisbet AF
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 15921830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An extended critical review of twenty years of countermeasures used in agriculture after the Chernobyl accident.
    Fesenko SV; Alexakhin RM; Balonov MI; Bogdevitch IM; Howard BJ; Kashparov VA; Sanzharova NI; Panov AV; Voigt G; Zhuchenka YM
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Sep; 383(1-3):1-24. PubMed ID: 17573097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finnish stakeholder engagement in the restoration of a radioactively contaminated food supply chain.
    Rantavaara A; Wallin H; Hasunen K; Härmälä K; Kulmala H; Latvio E; Liskola K; Mustonen I; Nieminen I; Tainio R
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):305-17. PubMed ID: 15905000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Achievements, difficulties and future challenges for the FARMING network.
    Nisbet AF; Mercer JA; Rantavaara A; Hanninen R; Vandecasteele C; Carlé B; Hardeman F; Ioannides KG; Papachristodoulou C; Tzialla C; Ollagnon H; Jullien T; Pupin V
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):263-74. PubMed ID: 15951072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attitude of a group of Belgian stakeholders towards proposed agricultural countermeasures after a radioactive contamination: synthesis of the discussions within the Belgian EC-FARMING group.
    Vandecasteele CM; Hardeman F; Pauwels O; Bernaerts M; Carlé B; Sombré L
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):319-32. PubMed ID: 15961199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rural areas affected by the Chernobyl accident: radiation exposure and remediation strategies.
    Jacob P; Fesenko S; Bogdevitch I; Kashparov V; Sanzharova N; Grebenshikova N; Isamov N; Lazarev N; Panov A; Ulanovsky A; Zhuchenko Y; Zhurba M
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 19811802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A critical evaluation of the strategy project.
    Howard BJ; Liland A; Beresford NA; Andersson KG; Cox G; Gil JM; Hunt J; Nisbet A; Oughton DH; Voigt G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):63-7. PubMed ID: 15238658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Methods of analysis of protective measures in agriculture regarding radioactively contaminated land: evaluation of the effectiveness, intervention levels and comparison of different countermeasures].
    Iatsalo BI; Aleksakhin RM
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 1997; 37(5):812-22. PubMed ID: 9417311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Twenty years' application of agricultural countermeasures following the Chernobyl accident: lessons learned.
    Fesenko SV; Alexakhin RM; Balonov MI; Bogdevich IM; Howard BJ; Kashparov VA; Sanzharova NI; Panov AV; Voigt G; Zhuchenka YM
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Dec; 26(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 17146120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing potential secondary effects of countermeasures in agricultural systems: a review.
    Salt CA; Rafferty B
    J Environ Radioact; 2001; 56(1-2):99-114. PubMed ID: 11446126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overview of the wisdom stakeholder workshop on restoration management.
    Nisbet AF; Mercer JA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):101-4. PubMed ID: 15238665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Countermeasures for reducing radioactive contamination of farm animals and farm animal products.
    Hove K; Strand P; Voigt G; Jones BE; Segal MG; Pollaris K; Pearce J
    Sci Total Environ; 1993 Sep; 137():261-71. PubMed ID: 8248772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Analysis of the strategy for the use of protective measures in agriculture after the accident at the Chernobyl power plant].
    Fesenko SV; Aleksakhin RM; Sanzhrova NI; Lisianskiĭ BG
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 1998; 38(5):721-36. PubMed ID: 9876496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A plan for the handling of externally contaminated livestock.
    McMillan D; Johnson T; Guo Y; Brandl A
    Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101 Suppl 3():S164-9. PubMed ID: 21968824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current Measures on Radioactive Contamination in Japan: A Policy Situation Analysis.
    Gilmour S; Miyagawa S; Kasuga F; Shibuya K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152040. PubMed ID: 27007509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Valentin J;
    Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Reduction of 137caesium contamination in wild boars by supplementing offered food with ammonium-iron-hexa-cyanoferrate].
    Morfeld P; Reddemann J; Schungel P; Kienzle E
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere; 2014; 42(6):360-7. PubMed ID: 25284353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.