974 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15908313)
1. Modified magnetic resonance angiography of the liver using sensitivity encoding in comparison with digital subtraction angiography and CT arterial portography.
Yan SX; Liang TB; Fujii M; Kawamitsu H; Sugimura K; Zheng SS
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2005 May; 4(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 15908313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.
Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Kos S; Rasmus M; Jaeger K; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19031180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial.
Bui BT; Miller S; Mildenberger P; Sam A; Sheng R;
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1402-10. PubMed ID: 20512893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Preoperative imaging in 78 living kidney donors using CE-MRA and DSA].
Lemke U; Taupitz M; Klüner C; Giessing M; Schönberger B; Hamm B; Kröncke TJ
Rofo; 2008 Jan; 180(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 18092278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Magnetic resonance angiography with three-dimensional dynamic technique after contrast media administration for the study of the portal system ].
Squillaci E; Mazzoleni C; Sodani G; Fanucci E; Masala S; Romagnoli A; Sergiacomi G; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 2001 Oct; 102(4):238-44. PubMed ID: 11740451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Three-dimensional reconstruction and image fusion between liver focal lesions and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography].
Li Y; Liang BL; Zhang R; Xu XM; Ren JJ; Ye RX; Zhong JL
Ai Zheng; 2006 Jul; 25(7):888-91. PubMed ID: 16831284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Hellmich M; Nijenhuis M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of magnetic resonance angiography for assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm before endoluminal repair.
Nasim A; Thompson MM; Sayers RD; Boyle JR; Hartshorne T; Moody AR; Bell PR
Br J Surg; 1998 May; 85(5):641-4. PubMed ID: 9635811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Right-lobe living related liver transplantation: evaluation of a comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging protocol for assessing potential donors.
Goyen M; Barkhausen J; Debatin JF; Kühl H; Bosk S; Testa G; Malago M; Ruehm SG
Liver Transpl; 2002 Mar; 8(3):241-50. PubMed ID: 11910569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography.
Meissner OA; Verrel F; Tató F; Siebert U; Ramirez H; Ruppert V; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1269-77. PubMed ID: 15525747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities: standard-dose vs. high-dose gadodiamide injection.
Krause U; Kroencke T; Spielhaupter E; Taupitz M; Kenn W; Hamm B; Hahn D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 21(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 15778953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of single-dose contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in therapy indications in abdominal and iliac arteries.
Schaefer PJ; Schaefer FK; Mueller-Huelsbeck S; Both M; Heller M; Jahnke T
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(3):376-82. PubMed ID: 17278036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and safety of gadodiamide (Gd-DTPA-BMA) in renal 3D-magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): a phase II study.
Kittner T; Rudolf J; Fages JF; Legmann P; Aschauer M; Repa I; Alvares MR; Savalegui I; Ittrich H; Geterud K; de Kevviler E; Ayuso J; Lockhart ME; Blum A; Iliasch H; Leisinger G; van Beek EJ; Reid AW; Brown JJ; Yu TC; Flamm SD; Düber C; Judmaier W; Reimer P; Stiskal M; Kramann B; Wolff S; Blankenstein C
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 64(3):456-64. PubMed ID: 17412546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnosis of systemic arterial diseases with whole-body 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.
Lin J; Chen B; Wang JH
Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Nov; 119(21):1772-8. PubMed ID: 17097030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Costs in follow-up of endovascularly repaired abdominal aortic aneurysms. Magnetic resonance imaging with MR angiography versus EUROSTAR protocols.
Engellau L; Albrechtsson U; Höjgård S; Norgren L; Larsson EM
Int Angiol; 2003 Mar; 22(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12771854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography for evaluating recipient vessels in orthotopic liver transplantation.
Bian J; Sha L; Yang C; Sun CS
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2008 Oct; 7(5):476-80. PubMed ID: 18842492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the epigastric and hepatic regions: visibility in three-dimensional reconstructions.
Sakai G; Nishida N; Yamada R; Matsuoka T
Osaka City Med J; 2000 Jun; 46(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 10983462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast-spoiled gradient magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries for potential living renal transplant donors: a comparative study with digital subtraction angiography.
Al-Saeed O; Ismail M; Sheikh M; Al-Moosawi M; Al-Khawari H
Australas Radiol; 2005 Jun; 49(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 15932463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography.
Villablanca JP; Nael K; Habibi R; Nael A; Laub G; Finn JP
Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):799-805. PubMed ID: 17035870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stenosis detection in failing hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts: comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.
Doelman C; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Froger CL; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Cuypers PW; Douwes-Draaijer P; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
J Vasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 42(4):739-46. PubMed ID: 16242563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
