696 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15908534)
1. The status of appendiceal CT in an urban medical center 5 years after its introduction: experience with 753 patients.
Rhea JT; Halpern EF; Ptak T; Lawrason JN; Sacknoff R; Novelline RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1802-8. PubMed ID: 15908534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates.
Bendeck SE; Nino-Murcia M; Berry GJ; Jeffrey RB
Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 12354996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources.
Rao PM; Rhea JT; Novelline RA; Mostafavi AA; McCabe CJ
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 9428814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study.
Coursey CA; Nelson RC; Patel MB; Cochran C; Dodd LG; Delong DM; Beam CA; Vaslef S
Radiology; 2010 Feb; 254(2):460-8. PubMed ID: 20093517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of cross-sectional imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates in children.
Applegate KE; Sivit CJ; Salvator AE; Borisa VJ; Dudgeon DL; Stallion AE; Grisoni ER
Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 11425980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis.
Weyant MJ; Eachempati SR; Maluccio MA; Rivadeneira DE; Grobmyer SR; Hydo LJ; Barie PS
Surgery; 2000 Aug; 128(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 10922984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of focused appendiceal CT in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis.
Wijetunga R; Tan BS; Rouse JC; Bigg-Wither GW; Doust BD
Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):747-53. PubMed ID: 11719671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children does not influence the overall rate of negative appendectomy or perforation.
Weyant MJ; Eachempati SR; Maluccio MA; Spigland N; Hydo LJ; Barie PS
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2001; 2(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 12594877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates.
Rao PM; Rhea JT; Rattner DW; Venus LG; Novelline RA
Ann Surg; 1999 Mar; 229(3):344-9. PubMed ID: 10077046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can computed tomography scan be performed effectively in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis without the added morbidity of rectal contrast?
Dearing DD; Recabaren JA; Alexander M
Am Surg; 2008 Oct; 74(10):917-20. PubMed ID: 18942613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The diagnosis of appendicitis in children: outcomes of a strategy based on pediatric surgical evaluation.
Kosloske AM; Love CL; Rohrer JE; Goldthorn JF; Lacey SR
Pediatrics; 2004 Jan; 113(1 Pt 1):29-34. PubMed ID: 14702443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of preoperative computed tomography on patients undergoing appendectomy.
McDonald GP; Pendarvis DP; Wilmoth R; Daley BJ
Am Surg; 2001 Nov; 67(11):1017-21. PubMed ID: 11730216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a pediatric population: to CT or not to CT.
Stephen AE; Segev DL; Ryan DP; Mullins ME; Kim SH; Schnitzer JJ; Doody DP
J Pediatr Surg; 2003 Mar; 38(3):367-71; discsussion 367-71. PubMed ID: 12632351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical guidelines, computed tomography scan, and negative appendectomies: a case series.
Harswick C; Uyenishi AA; Kordick MF; Chan SB
Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Jan; 24(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 16338513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Appendicitis: the impact of computed tomography imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates.
Balthazar EJ; Rofsky NM; Zucker R
Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 May; 93(5):768-71. PubMed ID: 9625125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective.
Raja AS; Wright C; Sodickson AD; Zane RD; Schiff GD; Hanson R; Baeyens PF; Khorasani R
Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):460-5. PubMed ID: 20529988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the normal appendix at low-dose non-enhanced spiral CT.
Bursali A; Araç M; Oner AY; Celik H; Ekşioğlu S; Gümüş T
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2005 Mar; 11(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 15795844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When should we order a CT scan and when should we rely on the results to diagnose an acute appendicitis?
Ceydeli A; Lavotshkin S; Yu J; Wise L
Curr Surg; 2006; 63(6):464-8. PubMed ID: 17084779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination.
Rao PM; Rhea JT; Novelline RA; McCabe CJ; Lawrason JN; Berger DL; Sacknoff R
Radiology; 1997 Jan; 202(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 8988203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reassessment of CT images to improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis and an equivocal preoperative CT interpretation.
Kim HC; Yang DM; Kim SW; Park SJ
Eur Radiol; 2012 Jun; 22(6):1178-85. PubMed ID: 22193372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
