184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15908539)
1. CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium.
Lefere P; Gryspeerdt S; Marrannes J; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1836-42. PubMed ID: 15908539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison study of different bowel preparation regimens and different fecal-tagging agents on tagging efficacy, patients' compliance, and diagnostic performance of computed tomographic colonography: preliminary study.
Yoon SH; Kim SH; Kim SG; Kim SJ; Lee JM; Lee JY; Han JK; Choi BI
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 19820488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance.
Lefere PA; Gryspeerdt SS; Dewyspelaere J; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck BG
Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 12147834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study.
Dachman AH; Dawson DO; Lefere P; Yoshida H; Khan NU; Cipriani N; Rubin DT
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 16969601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of the fecal-tagging quality in CT colonography: barium vs. iodinated oral contrast agent.
Nagata K; Singh AK; Sangwaiya MJ; Näppi J; Zalis ME; Cai W; Yoshida H
Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1393-9. PubMed ID: 19596591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging.
Taylor SA; Slater A; Burling DN; Tam E; Greenhalgh R; Gartner L; Scarth J; Pearce R; Bassett P; Halligan S
Eur Radiol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 17404739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: performance characteristics in an increased-risk population.
Jensch S; de Vries AH; Peringa J; Bipat S; Dekker E; Baak LC; Bartelsman JF; Heutinck A; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 18292475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of two minimal-preparation regimes for CT colonography: optimising image quality and patient acceptability.
Pollentine A; Mortimer A; McCoubrie P; Archer L
Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):1085-92. PubMed ID: 22422379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT colonography: patient tolerance of laxative free fecal tagging regimen versus traditional cathartic cleansing.
Buccicardi D; Grosso M; Caviglia I; Gastaldo A; Carbone S; Neri E; Bartolozzi C; Quadri P
Abdom Imaging; 2011 Oct; 36(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 20959977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fecal tag CT colonography with a limited 2-day bowel preparation following incomplete colonoscopy.
Meric K; Bakal N; Aydin S; Yesil A; Tekesin K; Simsek M
Jpn J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):329-35. PubMed ID: 25895857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fecal-tagging CT colonography with structure-analysis electronic cleansing for detection of colorectal flat lesions.
Xu Y; Cai W; Nappi J; Yoshida H
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):1712-6. PubMed ID: 21596500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual-energy based spectral electronic cleansing in non-cathartic computed tomography colonography: an emerging novel technique.
Eliahou R; Azraq Y; Carmi R; Mahgerefteh SY; Sosna J
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2010 Aug; 31(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 20691931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy.
Gryspeerdt S; Lefere P; Herman M; Deman R; Rutgeerts L; Ghillebert G; Baert F; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck B
Eur Radiol; 2005 Jun; 15(6):1192-202. PubMed ID: 15702335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Iohexol versus diatrizoate for fecal/fluid tagging during CT colonography performed with cathartic preparation: comparison of examination quality.
Kim B; Park SH; Hong GS; Lee JH; Lee JS; Kim HJ; Kim AY; Ha HK
Eur Radiol; 2015 Jun; 25(6):1561-9. PubMed ID: 25576229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience.
Lauenstein TC; Goehde SC; Ruehm SG; Holtmann G; Debatin JF
Radiology; 2002 Apr; 223(1):248-54. PubMed ID: 11930074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Noncathartic CT colonography with stool tagging: performance with and without electronic stool subtraction.
Johnson CD; Manduca A; Fletcher JG; MacCarty RL; Carston MJ; Harmsen WS; Mandrekar JN
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 18212221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bowel preparation for CT colonography: blinded comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for catharsis.
Borden ZS; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DH; Lubner MG; Agriantonis DJ; Hinshaw JL
Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 20032148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An interview study analysing patients' experiences and perceptions of non-laxative or full-laxative preparation with faecal tagging prior to CT colonography.
Ghanouni A; Smith SG; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Plumb A; Boone D; von Wagner C
Clin Radiol; 2013 May; 68(5):472-8. PubMed ID: 23265916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR colonography with fecal tagging: barium vs. barium ferumoxsil.
Achiam MP; Chabanova E; Løgager VB; Andersen LP; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Acad Radiol; 2008 May; 15(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 18423314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed tomography colonography: Retrospective comparison of laxative plus barium tagging versus iodinated contrast only for bowel preparation and faecal tagging.
Perry E; Moore H; Reeve J
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Apr; 63(2):203-211. PubMed ID: 30785667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
