These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15908539)
1. CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium. Lefere P; Gryspeerdt S; Marrannes J; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck B AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1836-42. PubMed ID: 15908539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison study of different bowel preparation regimens and different fecal-tagging agents on tagging efficacy, patients' compliance, and diagnostic performance of computed tomographic colonography: preliminary study. Yoon SH; Kim SH; Kim SG; Kim SJ; Lee JM; Lee JY; Han JK; Choi BI J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 19820488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Lefere PA; Gryspeerdt SS; Dewyspelaere J; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck BG Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 12147834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study. Dachman AH; Dawson DO; Lefere P; Yoshida H; Khan NU; Cipriani N; Rubin DT Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 16969601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of the fecal-tagging quality in CT colonography: barium vs. iodinated oral contrast agent. Nagata K; Singh AK; Sangwaiya MJ; Näppi J; Zalis ME; Cai W; Yoshida H Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1393-9. PubMed ID: 19596591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging. Taylor SA; Slater A; Burling DN; Tam E; Greenhalgh R; Gartner L; Scarth J; Pearce R; Bassett P; Halligan S Eur Radiol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 17404739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: performance characteristics in an increased-risk population. Jensch S; de Vries AH; Peringa J; Bipat S; Dekker E; Baak LC; Bartelsman JF; Heutinck A; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 18292475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of two minimal-preparation regimes for CT colonography: optimising image quality and patient acceptability. Pollentine A; Mortimer A; McCoubrie P; Archer L Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):1085-92. PubMed ID: 22422379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT colonography: patient tolerance of laxative free fecal tagging regimen versus traditional cathartic cleansing. Buccicardi D; Grosso M; Caviglia I; Gastaldo A; Carbone S; Neri E; Bartolozzi C; Quadri P Abdom Imaging; 2011 Oct; 36(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 20959977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fecal tag CT colonography with a limited 2-day bowel preparation following incomplete colonoscopy. Meric K; Bakal N; Aydin S; Yesil A; Tekesin K; Simsek M Jpn J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):329-35. PubMed ID: 25895857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fecal-tagging CT colonography with structure-analysis electronic cleansing for detection of colorectal flat lesions. Xu Y; Cai W; Nappi J; Yoshida H Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):1712-6. PubMed ID: 21596500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy. Gryspeerdt S; Lefere P; Herman M; Deman R; Rutgeerts L; Ghillebert G; Baert F; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck B Eur Radiol; 2005 Jun; 15(6):1192-202. PubMed ID: 15702335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Iohexol versus diatrizoate for fecal/fluid tagging during CT colonography performed with cathartic preparation: comparison of examination quality. Kim B; Park SH; Hong GS; Lee JH; Lee JS; Kim HJ; Kim AY; Ha HK Eur Radiol; 2015 Jun; 25(6):1561-9. PubMed ID: 25576229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Noncathartic CT colonography with stool tagging: performance with and without electronic stool subtraction. Johnson CD; Manduca A; Fletcher JG; MacCarty RL; Carston MJ; Harmsen WS; Mandrekar JN AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 18212221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bowel preparation for CT colonography: blinded comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for catharsis. Borden ZS; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DH; Lubner MG; Agriantonis DJ; Hinshaw JL Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 20032148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An interview study analysing patients' experiences and perceptions of non-laxative or full-laxative preparation with faecal tagging prior to CT colonography. Ghanouni A; Smith SG; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Plumb A; Boone D; von Wagner C Clin Radiol; 2013 May; 68(5):472-8. PubMed ID: 23265916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed tomography colonography: Retrospective comparison of laxative plus barium tagging versus iodinated contrast only for bowel preparation and faecal tagging. Perry E; Moore H; Reeve J J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Apr; 63(2):203-211. PubMed ID: 30785667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]