These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15909235)

  • 1. Mail surveys: obsolescent model or valuable instrument in general practice research?
    Bergk V; Gasse C; Schnell R; Haefeli WE
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2005 Apr; 135(13-14):189-91. PubMed ID: 15909235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do incentives, reminders or reduced burden improve healthcare professional response rates in postal questionnaires? two randomised controlled trials.
    Glidewell L; Thomas R; MacLennan G; Bonetti D; Johnston M; Eccles MP; Edlin R; Pitts NB; Clarkson J; Steen N; Grimshaw JM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Aug; 12():250. PubMed ID: 22891875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of a financial incentive on health researchers' response to an online survey: a randomized controlled trial.
    Wilson PM; Petticrew M; Calnan M; Nazareth I
    J Med Internet Res; 2010 May; 12(2):e13. PubMed ID: 20457556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of a postcard versus a questionnaire as a first reminder in a postal lifestyle survey.
    Roberts H; Pearson JC; Dengler R
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1993 Aug; 47(4):334-5. PubMed ID: 8228774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner's survey response rates - a systematic review.
    Pit SW; Vo T; Pyakurel S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jun; 14():76. PubMed ID: 24906492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized trial of use of a monetary incentive and a reminder card to increase the response rate to a mailed health survey.
    Perneger TV; Etter JF; Rougemont A
    Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Nov; 138(9):714-22. PubMed ID: 8237986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of different monetary incentives on the return rate of a national mail survey of physicians.
    VanGeest JB; Wynia MK; Cummins DS; Wilson IB
    Med Care; 2001 Feb; 39(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 11176557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mailed survey follow-ups--are postcard reminders more cost-effective than second questionnaires?
    Becker H; Cookston J; Kulberg V
    West J Nurs Res; 2000 Aug; 22(5):642-7. PubMed ID: 10943176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SMS text pre-notification and delivery of reminder e-mails to increase response rates to postal questionnaires in the SUSPEND trial: a factorial design, randomised controlled trial.
    Starr K; McPherson G; Forrest M; Cotton SC
    Trials; 2015 Jul; 16():295. PubMed ID: 26152519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A method for achieving high response rates in national surveys of U.S. primary care physicians.
    Brtnikova M; Crane LA; Allison MA; Hurley LP; Beaty BL; Kempe A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202755. PubMed ID: 30138406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients' experiences with breast care.
    Zuidgeest M; Hendriks M; Koopman L; Spreeuwenberg P; Rademakers J
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):e68. PubMed ID: 21946048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals.
    Asch DA; Jedrziewski MK; Christakis NA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Oct; 50(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 9368521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations.
    Sibbald B; Addington-Hall J; Brenneman D; Freeling P
    Br J Gen Pract; 1994 Jul; 44(384):297-300. PubMed ID: 8068375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Which Outreach Modes Improve Response Rates to Physician Surveys? Lessons from an Experiment at the American Board of Internal Medicine.
    Barnhart BJ; Reddy SG; Vandergrift JL
    Eval Health Prof; 2023 Mar; 46(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 36445930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response rates in postal surveys of healthcare professionals between 1996 and 2005: an observational study.
    Cook JV; Dickinson HO; Eccles MP
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2009 Sep; 9():160. PubMed ID: 19751504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects on response rates and costs of stamps vs business reply in a mail survey of physicians.
    Urban N; Anderson GL; Tseng A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 May; 46(5):455-9. PubMed ID: 8501471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment.
    Cook DA; Wittich CM; Daniels WL; West CP; Harris AM; Beebe TJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e244. PubMed ID: 27637296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized experiment on the effect of incentives and mailing strategy on response rates in a mail survey of dentists.
    McKernan SC; Reynolds JC; McInroy B; Damiano PC
    J Public Health Dent; 2022 Sep; 82(4):484-490. PubMed ID: 35243631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study.
    Pit SW; Hansen V; Ewald D
    BMC Fam Pract; 2013 Jul; 14():108. PubMed ID: 23899116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.