575 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15909324)
1. The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry.
Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Buvat I; Ville Y
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 25(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15909324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using Z-scores to compare biometry data obtained during prenatal ultrasound screening by midwives and physicians.
Capmas P; Salomon LJ; Picone O; Fuchs F; Frydman R; Senat MV
Prenat Diagn; 2010 Jan; 30(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 19960449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry.
Jung SI; Lee YH; Moon MH; Song MJ; Min JY; Kim JA; Park JH; Yang JH; Kim MY; Chung JH; Cho JY; Kim KG
Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 17431930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of Z-scores to select a fetal biometric reference curve.
Sananes N; Guigue V; Kohler M; Bouffet N; Cancellier M; Hornecker F; Hunsinger MC; Kohler A; Mager C; Neumann M; Schmerber E; Tanghe M; Nisand I; Favre R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 19731264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of Z-score distribution for the quality control of fetal ultrasound measurements at 20-24 weeks.
Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Ville Y
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Dec; 26(7):750-4. PubMed ID: 16308899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fetal biometry in ethnic Chinese: biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length.
Leung TN; Pang MW; Daljit SS; Leung TY; Poon CF; Wong SM; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 18241086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimation of fetal weight: reference range at 20-36 weeks' gestation and comparison with actual birth-weight reference range.
Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Ville Y
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 17444561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revisiting first-trimester fetal biometry.
Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Dorion A; Ville Y
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 22(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 12858306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts.
Salomon LJ; Duyme M; Crequat J; Brodaty G; Talmant C; Fries N; Althuser M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 16570263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Continuous independent quality control for fetal ultrasound biometry provided by the cumulative summation technique.
Balsyte D; Schäffer L; Burkhardt T; Wisser J; Zimmermann R; Kurmanavicius J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):449-55. PubMed ID: 20052663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement error for ultrasound fetal biometry performed by paramedics in rural Bangladesh.
Neufeld LM; Wagatsuma Y; Hussain R; Begum M; Frongillo EA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 19504627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal size charts for the Italian population. Normative curves of head, abdomen and long bones.
Paladini D; Rustico M; Viora E; Giani U; Bruzzese D; Campogrande M; Martinelli P
Prenat Diagn; 2005 Jun; 25(6):456-64. PubMed ID: 15966062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Charts for fetal age assessment based on fetal sonographic biometry in a population from Cali, Colombia.
Briceño F; Restrepo H; Paredes R; Cifuentes R
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Dec; 32(12):2135-43. PubMed ID: 24277896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Ultrasonographic fetal biometry charts in Niger].
Vangeenderhuysen C; Nono M
Med Trop (Mars); 1998; 58(4):381-4. PubMed ID: 10399699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal biometric ratios by transvaginal sonography as a marker for aneuploidies in early pregnancy.
Guariglia L; Rosati P
Prenat Diagn; 1997 May; 17(5):415-22. PubMed ID: 9178315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Customizing fetal biometric charts.
Pang MW; Leung TN; Sahota DS; Lau TK; Chang AM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Sep; 22(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 12942500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
De Reu PA; Smits LJ; Oosterbaan HP; Nijhuis JG
J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal Biometry in the Israeli Population: New Reference Charts.
Daniel-Spiegel E; Mandel M; Nevo D; Ben-Chetrit A; Shen O; Shalev E; Yagel S
Isr Med Assoc J; 2016 Jan; 18(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 26964279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Growth charts of fetal biometry: a longitudinal study.
Munim S; Morris T; Baber N; Ansari Y; Azam SI
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Jun; 25(6):692-8. PubMed ID: 21819339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal size charts for a population from Cali, Colombia: sonographic measurements of biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length.
Briceño F; Restrepo H; Paredes R; Cifuentes R
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Jul; 32(7):1215-25. PubMed ID: 23804344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
