These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15910118)

  • 1. Testing for suspected impairments and dissociations in single-case studies in neuropsychology: evaluation of alternatives using monte carlo simulations and revised tests for dissociations.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH
    Neuropsychology; 2005 May; 19(3):318-31. PubMed ID: 15910118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of criteria for classical dissociations in single-case studies by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH
    Neuropsychology; 2005 Sep; 19(5):664-78. PubMed ID: 16187885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simple dissociations for a higher-powered neuropsychology.
    McIntosh RD
    Cortex; 2018 Jun; 103():256-265. PubMed ID: 29673782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting dissociations in single-case studies: Type I errors, statistical power and the classical versus strong distinction.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2249-58. PubMed ID: 16820178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wanted: fully operational definitions of dissociations in single-case studies.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Gray CD
    Cortex; 2003 Apr; 39(2):357-70. PubMed ID: 12784893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing a single case to a control group - Applying linear mixed effects models to repeated measures data.
    Huber S; Klein E; Moeller K; Willmes K
    Cortex; 2015 Oct; 71():148-59. PubMed ID: 26218619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying dissociations in neuropsychological research.
    Bates E; Appelbaum M; Salcedo J; Saygin AP; Pizzamiglio L
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Dec; 25(8):1128-53. PubMed ID: 14566586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing a single case to a control sample: testing for neuropsychological deficits and dissociations in the presence of covariates.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Ryan K
    Cortex; 2011; 47(10):1166-78. PubMed ID: 21458788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single-case research in neuropsychology: a comparison of five forms of t-test for comparing a case to controls.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH
    Cortex; 2012 Sep; 48(8):1009-16. PubMed ID: 21843884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developmental disorders: what can be learned from cognitive neuropsychology?
    Castles A; Kohnen S; Nickels L; Brock J
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2014; 369(1634):20130407. PubMed ID: 24324246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximizing the power of comparing single cases against a control sample: an argument, a program for making comparisons, and a worked example from the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test.
    Hulleman J; Humphreys GW
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2007 May; 24(3):279-91. PubMed ID: 18416492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing for a deficit in single-case studies: effects of departures from normality.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Azzalini A; Howell DC; Laws KR
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):666-77. PubMed ID: 16046228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Monte Carlo evaluation of tests for comparing dependent correlations.
    Hittner JB; May K; Silver NC
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):149-68. PubMed ID: 12773018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intra-individual measures of association in neuropsychology: inferential methods for comparing a single case with a control or normative sample.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Howell DC; Venneri A
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2003 Nov; 9(7):989-1000. PubMed ID: 14738281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multivariate normative comparisons.
    Huizenga HM; Smeding H; Grasman RP; Schmand B
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jun; 45(11):2534-42. PubMed ID: 17451757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Normative comparisons for large neuropsychological test batteries: User-friendly and sensitive solutions to minimize familywise false positives.
    Huizenga HM; Agelink van Rentergem JA; Grasman RP; Muslimovic D; Schmand B
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016 Aug; 38(6):611-29. PubMed ID: 27167864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissociations in neuropsychological single-case studies: Should one subtract raw or standardized (z) scores?
    Toraldo A
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 May; 169():108193. PubMed ID: 35247434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. False-positive rates associated with the use of multiple performance and symptom validity tests.
    Larrabee GJ
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2014 Jun; 29(4):364-73. PubMed ID: 24769887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte Carlo simulation of TrueBeam flattening-filter-free beams using varian phase-space files: comparison with experimental data.
    Belosi MF; Rodriguez M; Fogliata A; Cozzi L; Sempau J; Clivio A; Nicolini G; Vanetti E; Krauss H; Khamphan C; Fenoglietto P; Puxeu J; Fedele D; Mancosu P; Brualla L
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051707. PubMed ID: 24784373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How accurate is the Pearson r-from-Z approximation? A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Hittner JB; May K
    J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(2):68-77. PubMed ID: 24836910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.