197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15910129)
1. Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming.
Morgan JL; Meyer AS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):428-42. PubMed ID: 15910129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Parallel processing of objects in a naming task.
Meyer AS; Ouellet M; Häcker C
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jul; 34(4):982-7. PubMed ID: 18605882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The time course of name retrieval during multiple-object naming: evidence from extrafoveal-on-foveal effects.
Malpass D; Meyer AS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):523-37. PubMed ID: 20192547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition.
Yee E; Sedivy JC
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 16478336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Object-scene inconsistencies do not capture gaze: evidence from the flash-preview moving-window paradigm.
Võ ML; Henderson JM
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1742-53. PubMed ID: 21607814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Age of acquisition effects on an object-name verification task.
Catling JC; Johnston RA
Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):1-18. PubMed ID: 16464284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implicit learning of semantic category sequences: response-independent acquisition of abstract sequential regularities.
Goschke T; Bolte A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):394-406. PubMed ID: 17352620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm.
Belke E; Meyer AS; Damian MF
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 May; 58(4):667-92. PubMed ID: 16104101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Object-intrinsic oddities draw early saccades.
Becker MW; Pashler H; Lubin J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 17311476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identifying objects across saccades: effects of extrafoveal preview and flanker object context.
Henderson JM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 May; 18(3):521-30. PubMed ID: 1534353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints.
Dahan D; Tanenhaus MK
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):498-513. PubMed ID: 14979820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Young children associate novel words with complex objects rather than salient parts.
Hollich G; Golinkoff RM; Hirsh-Pasek K
Dev Psychol; 2007 Sep; 43(5):1051-61. PubMed ID: 17723035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In the infant's mind's ear: evidence for implicit naming in 18-month-olds.
Mani N; Plunkett K
Psychol Sci; 2010 Jul; 21(7):908-13. PubMed ID: 20519485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semantic context and visual feature effects in object naming: an fMRI study using arterial spin labeling.
Hocking J; McMahon KL; de Zubicaray GI
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1571-83. PubMed ID: 18823254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm.
Huettig F; Altmann GT
Cognition; 2005 May; 96(1):B23-32. PubMed ID: 15833303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intersensory redundancy facilitates learning of arbitrary relations between vowel sounds and objects in seven-month-old infants.
Gogate LJ; Bahrick LE
J Exp Child Psychol; 1998 May; 69(2):133-49. PubMed ID: 9637756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repetition suppression in occipital-temporal visual areas is modulated by physical rather than semantic features of objects.
Chouinard PA; Morrissey BF; Köhler S; Goodale MA
Neuroimage; 2008 May; 41(1):130-44. PubMed ID: 18375148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Young children's disambiguation of object name reference.
Merriman WE; Schuster JM
Child Dev; 1991 Dec; 62(6):1288-301. PubMed ID: 1786716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.
Võ ML; Henderson JM
J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):24.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning.
Roelofs A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1580-98. PubMed ID: 19045994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
