554 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15910257)
1. Combined ureterorenoscopy and shockwave lithotripsy for large renal stone burden: an alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
Hafron J; Fogarty JD; Boczko J; Hoenig DM
J Endourol; 2005 May; 19(4):464-8. PubMed ID: 15910257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience.
Hyams ES; Munver R; Bird VG; Uberoi J; Shah O
J Endourol; 2010 Oct; 24(10):1583-8. PubMed ID: 20629566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single upper-pole percutaneous access for treatment of > or = 5-cm complex branched staghorn calculi: is shockwave lithotripsy necessary?
Wong C; Leveillee RJ
J Endourol; 2002 Sep; 16(7):477-81. PubMed ID: 12396440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of treatment modalities for renal calculi between 100 and 300 mm2: are shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy equivalent?
Wiesenthal JD; Ghiculete D; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
J Endourol; 2011 Mar; 25(3):481-5. PubMed ID: 21351888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultramini nephrostomy tract combined with flexible ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of multiple renal calculi in paediatric patients.
Guo J; Yang WZ; Zhang Y; An F; Wei R; Li Y; Zhang H
Korean J Urol; 2015 Jul; 56(7):519-24. PubMed ID: 26175871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor Staghorn calculi.
Grasso M; Conlin M; Bagley D
J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):346-51. PubMed ID: 9679874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study.
Chan LH; Good DW; Laing K; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Keanie JY; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):510-516. PubMed ID: 28355100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL) for large (≥1 cm) paediatric stones: Outcomes from a university teaching hospital.
Featherstone NC; Somani BK; Griffin SJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Apr; 13(2):202.e1-202.e7. PubMed ID: 28336220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.
Koo V; Young M; Thompson T; Duggan B
BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1913-6. PubMed ID: 21453346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy.
Preminger GM
Urol Res; 2006 Apr; 34(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 16463145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success rates.
Eden CG; Mark IR; Gupta RR; Eastman J; Shrotri NC; Tiptaft RC
J Endourol; 1998 Aug; 12(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 9726396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones.
Breda A; Ogunyemi O; Leppert JT; Schulam PG
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1190-6. PubMed ID: 18571315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endourologic Management (PCNL, URS, SWL) of Stones in Solitary Kidney: A Systematic Review from European Association of Urologists Young Academic Urologists and Uro-Technology Groups.
Pietropaolo A; Reeves T; Aboumarzouk O; Kallidonis P; Ozsoy M; Skolarikos A; Tailly T; Liatsikos E; Traxer O; Somani BK
J Endourol; 2020 Jan; 34(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 31456421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser in horseshoe kidneys.
Molimard B; Al-Qahtani S; Lakmichi A; Sejiny M; Gil-Diez de Medina S; Carpentier X; Traxer O
Urology; 2010 Dec; 76(6):1334-7. PubMed ID: 20573385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones: SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study.
Hendrikx AJ; Strijbos WE; de Knijff DW; Kums JJ; Doesburg WH; Lemmens WA
J Endourol; 1999 Dec; 13(10):727-33. PubMed ID: 10646679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flexible ureterorenoscopy is associated with less stone recurrence rates over Shockwave lithotripsy in the management of 10-20 millimeter lower pole renal stone: medium follow-up results.
Ozgor F; Sahan M; Yanaral F; Savun M; Sarilar O
Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(2):314-322. PubMed ID: 29412548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of previous open renal surgery and failed extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy on the performance and outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Resorlu B; Kara C; Senocak C; Cicekbilek I; Unsal A
J Endourol; 2010 Jan; 24(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 19958152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for management of pediatric nephrolithiasis in upper urinary tract stones: multi-institutional outcomes of efficacy and morbidity.
Marchetti KA; Lee T; Raja N; Corona L; Kraft KH; Wan J; Ellison JS
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Oct; 15(5):516.e1-516.e8. PubMed ID: 31326329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment of staghorn calculi by percutaneous nephrolithotomy and SWL: the Hotel Dieu de France experience.
Merhej S; Jabbour M; Samaha E; Chalouhi E; Moukarzel M; Khour R; Chaiban R
J Endourol; 1998 Feb; 12(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 9531142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
