931 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15910476)
21. Effect of three nickel-titanium rotary file techniques on infected root dentin reduction.
Chuste-Guillot MP; Badet C; Peli JF; Perez F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):254-8. PubMed ID: 16876071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals.
Ayar LR; Love RM
Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):593-601. PubMed ID: 15317562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of curved canal instrumentation using nickel-titanium or stainless steel files with the balanced-force technique.
Harlan AL; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1996 Aug; 22(8):410-3. PubMed ID: 8941749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of twisted files, Pathfile-ProTaper system, and stainless steel hand K-files by using computed tomography.
Gergi R; Rjeily JA; Sader J; Naaman A
J Endod; 2010 May; 36(5):904-7. PubMed ID: 20416443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [The effect of instrumentation on original apical foramen shape using steel vs niti rotatory: computerized analysis].
Gallina G; Cumbo E; Gallo P; Pizzo G; D'Angelo M
Minerva Stomatol; 2002; 51(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 11845115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Shaping ability and safety of five different rotary nickel-titanium instruments compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation in simulated curved root canals.
Schirrmeister JF; Strohl C; Altenburger MJ; Wrbas KT; Hellwig E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 16731405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
Int Endod J; 2006 Jul; 39(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 16776756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of shaft design on the shaping ability of 3 nickel-titanium rotary systems by means of spiral computerized tomography.
Versiani MA; Pascon EA; de Sousa CJ; Borges MA; Sousa-Neto MD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jun; 105(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 18424117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Properties of endodontic hand instruments used in rotary motion. Part 3. Resistance to bending and fracture.
Tepel J; Schäfer E; Hoppe W
J Endod; 1997 Mar; 23(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 9594751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of molar root canal preparation using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium instruments.
Carvalho LA; Bonetti I; Borges MA
J Endod; 1999 Dec; 25(12):807-10. PubMed ID: 10726526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Curved molar root canal preparations using Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Bertrand MF; Lupi-Pégurier L; Médioni E; Muller M; Bolla M
Int Endod J; 2001 Dec; 34(8):631-6. PubMed ID: 11762500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of apical root canal preparation using three instrumentation techniques.
Moore J; Fitz-Walter P; Parashos P
Int Endod J; 2009 Dec; 42(12):1057-64. PubMed ID: 19912375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Measure and compare the Degree of Root Canal Transportation and Canal-centering ability of Twisted, ProTaper, and Conventional Stainless Steel K Files using Spiral Computed Tomography: An in vitro Study.
Rejula F; Christalin R; Ahmed W; Dinakaran S; Gopinathan AS; Babu A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jun; 18(6):463-469. PubMed ID: 28621275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography.
Gambill JM; Alder M; del Rio CE
J Endod; 1996 Jul; 22(7):369-75. PubMed ID: 8935064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals.
D'Amario M; Baldi M; Petricca R; De Angelis F; El Abed R; D'Arcangelo C
J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1581-4. PubMed ID: 24238451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of tip design of nickel-titanium and stainless steel files on root canal preparation.
Kuhn WG; Carnes DL; Clement DJ; Walker WA
J Endod; 1997 Dec; 23(12):735-8. PubMed ID: 9487848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
