202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15910954)
1. Multiple birth resulting from ovarian stimulation for subfertility treatment.
Fauser BC; Devroey P; Macklon NS
Lancet; 2005 May 21-27; 365(9473):1807-16. PubMed ID: 15910954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Multiple pregnancies: epidemiology and management].
Braat DD; Schönbeck Y; Kremer JA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Oct; 147(40):1952-5. PubMed ID: 14574778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Goverde AJ; McDonnell J; Vermeiden JP; Schats R; Rutten FF; Schoemaker J
Lancet; 2000 Jan; 355(9197):13-8. PubMed ID: 10615885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. IVF with planned single-embryo transfer versus IUI with ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained subfertility: an economic analysis.
van Rumste MM; Custers IM; van Wely M; Koks CA; van Weering HG; Beckers NG; Scheffer GJ; Broekmans FJ; Hompes PG; Mochtar MH; van der Veen F; Mol BW
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Mar; 28(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 24456703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association between ovarian stimulators with or without intrauterine insemination, and assisted reproductive technologies on multiple births.
Chaabane S; Sheehy O; Monnier P; Bissonnette F; Trasler JM; Fraser W; Bérard A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):511.e1-511.e14. PubMed ID: 26079626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Couples with unexplained subfertility and unfavorable prognosis: a randomized pilot trial comparing the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with elective single embryo transfer versus intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian stimulation.
Custers IM; König TE; Broekmans FJ; Hompes PG; Kaaijk E; Oosterhuis J; Mochtar MH; Repping S; van Wely M; Steures P; van der Veen F; Mol BW
Fertil Steril; 2011 Nov; 96(5):1107-11.e1. PubMed ID: 21890134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conversion of cycles involving ovarian hyperstimulation with intra-uterine insemination to in-vitro fertilization.
Nisker J; Tummon I; Daniel S; Kaplan B; Yuzpe A
Hum Reprod; 1994 Mar; 9(3):406-8. PubMed ID: 8006125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cryobiology in human assisted reproductive technology. Would Hippocrates approve?
Bredkjaer HE; Grudzinskas JG
Early Pregnancy (Cherry Hill); 2001 Jul; 5(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 11753534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2004.
Sullivan EA; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Adamson GD
Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1375-90. PubMed ID: 23442757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is in vitro fertilisation more effective than stimulated intrauterine insemination as a first-line therapy for subfertility? A cohort analysis.
Chambers GM; Sullivan EA; Shanahan M; Ho MT; Priester K; Chapman MG
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Jun; 50(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 20618248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Intrauterine insemination: spontaneous or medically-assisted ovulation?].
Massin N; Cédrin-Durnerin I; Hugues JN
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004 Oct; 32(10):898-903. PubMed ID: 15501170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Fertility treatments: possibilities for fewer multiple births and lower costs--the 'Umbrella' study].
Merkus JM
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2006 May; 150(21):1162-4. PubMed ID: 16768277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation versus expectant management for couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis: a randomised clinical trial.
Steures P; van der Steeg JW; Hompes PG; Habbema JD; Eijkemans MJ; Broekmans FJ; Verhoeve HR; Bossuyt PM; van der Veen F; Mol BW;
Lancet; 2006 Jul; 368(9531):216-21. PubMed ID: 16844491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk factors for high-order multiple pregnancy and multiple birth after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: results of 4,062 intrauterine insemination cycles.
Dickey RP; Taylor SN; Lu PY; Sartor BM; Rye PH; Pyrzak R
Fertil Steril; 2005 Mar; 83(3):671-83. PubMed ID: 15749497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Intrauterine insemination: state-of-the-art in humans].
Royère D
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004 Oct; 32(10):873-9. PubMed ID: 15501166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination at the quarter centennial: implications for the multiple births epidemic.
McClamrock HD; Jones HW; Adashi EY
Fertil Steril; 2012 Apr; 97(4):802-9. PubMed ID: 22463774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomised controlled trial of intra-uterine insemination versus in vitro fertilisation in patients with idiopathic or mild male infertility.
Elzeiny H; Garrett C; Toledo M; Stern K; McBain J; Baker HW
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Apr; 54(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 24579923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2006 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2189-201. PubMed ID: 19439295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiple gestation pregnancy. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group.
Hum Reprod; 2000 Aug; 15(8):1856-64. PubMed ID: 10920117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
