These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15911467)

  • 1. The effect of scientific misconduct on the results of clinical trials: a Delphi survey.
    Al-Marzouki S; Roberts I; Marshall T; Evans S
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Jun; 26(3):331-7. PubMed ID: 15911467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical considerations in the interpretation and communication of clinical trial results.
    Coultas D
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2007 May; 4(2):194-8; discussion 198-9. PubMed ID: 17494731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research misconduct identified by the US Food and Drug Administration: out of sight, out of mind, out of the peer-reviewed literature.
    Seife C
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Apr; 175(4):567-77. PubMed ID: 25664866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ORI findings of scientific misconduct in clinical trials and publicly funded research, 1992-2002.
    Reynolds SM
    Clin Trials; 2004; 1(6):509-16. PubMed ID: 16279291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How a clinical trial registry became a symbol of misinformation.
    Miller JE
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2013; 43(6):11-2. PubMed ID: 24249467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What should be done about bias and misconduct in clinical trials?
    Fairman KA; Curtiss FR
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2009 Mar; 15(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 19236130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Authors' reports about research integrity problems in clinical trials.
    Gardner W; Lidz CW; Hartwig KC
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Apr; 26(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 15837444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comment on a retraction.
    Bonaz B; Bessard G; Zarski JP
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 May; 104(5):1334. PubMed ID: 19367265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct.
    Chalmers I
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1405-8. PubMed ID: 2304220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
    Resnik DB
    Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preparing whistleblowers for reporting research misconduct.
    Bonito AJ; Titus SL; Greene AM; Amoozegar J; Eicheldinger C; Wright DE
    Account Res; 2012; 19(5):308-28. PubMed ID: 23009270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.
    Fanelli D
    PLoS One; 2009 May; 4(5):e5738. PubMed ID: 19478950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: prevalence and causal factors.
    George SL
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Feb; 21(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 26289019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Research misconduct among clinical trial staff.
    Redman BK; Templin TN; Merz JF
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2006 Jul; 12(3):481-9. PubMed ID: 16909150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Guidance for the Conduct and Reporting of Clinical Trials of Breast Milk Substitutes.
    Jarrold K; Helfer B; Eskander M; Crawley H; Trabulsi J; Caulfield LE; Duffy G; Garcia-Larsen V; Hayward D; Hyde M; Jeffries S; Knip M; Leonardi-Bee J; Loder E; Lodge CJ; Lowe AJ; McGuire W; Osborn D; Przyrembel H; Renfrew MJ; Trumbo P; Warner J; Schneeman B; Boyle RJ
    JAMA Pediatr; 2020 Sep; 174(9):874-881. PubMed ID: 32391870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Misconduct in clinical scientific investigations].
    De Broe ME
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2004; 66(5-6):335-41. PubMed ID: 15641564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials.
    Al-Marzouki S; Evans S; Marshall T; Roberts I
    BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7511):267-70. PubMed ID: 16052019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data audit as a way to prevent/contain misconduct.
    Shamoo AE
    Account Res; 2013; 20(5-6):369-79. PubMed ID: 24028483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An accessible analytical approach for investigating what happens between the rounds of a Delphi study.
    Greatorex J; Dexter T
    J Adv Nurs; 2000 Oct; 32(4):1016-24. PubMed ID: 11095243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias in the design, interpretation, and publication of industry-sponsored clinical research.
    Hammerschmidt D
    Minn Med; 2008 Jun; 91(6):46-7. PubMed ID: 18616022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.