These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15911587)

  • 1. On the evolutionary stability of Mendelian segregation.
    Ubeda F; Haig D
    Genetics; 2005 Jul; 170(3):1345-57. PubMed ID: 15911587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonrandom segregation during meiosis: the unfairness of females.
    Pardo-Manuel de Villena F; Sapienza C
    Mamm Genome; 2001 May; 12(5):331-9. PubMed ID: 11331939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Common features of segregation distortion in plants and animals.
    Taylor DR; Ingvarsson PK
    Genetica; 2003 Jan; 117(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 12656570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evolution of the segregation ratio: modification of gene conversion and meiotic drive.
    Bengtsson BO; Uyenoyama MK
    Theor Popul Biol; 1990 Oct; 38(2):192-218. PubMed ID: 2247852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Random and non-random mating populations: Evolutionary dynamics in meiotic drive.
    Sarkar B
    Math Biosci; 2016 Jan; 271():29-41. PubMed ID: 26524140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why Mendelian segregation?
    Ubeda F
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2006 Aug; 34(Pt 4):566-8. PubMed ID: 16856862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The advantages of segregation and the evolution of sex.
    Otto SP
    Genetics; 2003 Jul; 164(3):1099-118. PubMed ID: 12871918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Segregation distortion and the evolution of sex-determining mechanisms.
    Kozielska M; Weissing FJ; Beukeboom LW; Pen I
    Heredity (Edinb); 2010 Jan; 104(1):100-12. PubMed ID: 19672280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why is Mendelian segregation so exact?
    Crow JF
    Bioessays; 1991 Jun; 13(6):305-12. PubMed ID: 1909864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Segregation analysis of two-locus models regulating apolipoprotein-A1 levels.
    Juo SH; Beaty TH; Xu J; Prenger VL; Coresh J; Kwiterovich PO
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(1):73-86. PubMed ID: 9523212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Segregation and the evolution of sex under overdominant selection.
    Dolgin ES; Otto SP
    Genetics; 2003 Jul; 164(3):1119-28. PubMed ID: 12871919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic Villains: Killer Meiotic Drivers.
    Bravo Núñez MA; Nuckolls NL; Zanders SE
    Trends Genet; 2018 Jun; 34(6):424-433. PubMed ID: 29499907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive meiotic drive in selfing populations with heterozygote advantage.
    Brud E
    Theor Popul Biol; 2022 Aug; 146():61-70. PubMed ID: 35839925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Games in tetrads: segregation, recombination, and meiotic drive.
    Haig D
    Am Nat; 2010 Oct; 176(4):404-13. PubMed ID: 20726770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preferential segregation of metacentric chromosomes in simple Robertsonian heterozygotes of Sorex araneus.
    Fedyk S; Chetnicki W
    Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Nov; 99(5):545-52. PubMed ID: 17700635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sex-specific meiotic drive and selection at an imprinted locus.
    Ubeda F; Haig D
    Genetics; 2004 Aug; 167(4):2083-95. PubMed ID: 15342542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evolution of genomic imprinting: two modifier-locus models.
    Spencer HG; Williams MJ
    Theor Popul Biol; 1997 Feb; 51(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 9149816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meiotic drive influences the outcome of sexually antagonistic selection at a linked locus.
    Patten MM
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Nov; 27(11):2360-70. PubMed ID: 25293344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial heterogeneity and the evolution of sex in diploids.
    Agrawal AF
    Am Nat; 2009 Jul; 174 Suppl 1():S54-70. PubMed ID: 19456268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Competition at the mouse t complex: rare alleles are inherently favored.
    van Boven M; Weissing FJ
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Dec; 60(4):343-58. PubMed ID: 11878834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.