These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15911587)

  • 21. Population models of genomic imprinting. I. Differential viability in the sexes and the analogy with genetic dominance.
    Anderson RJ; Spencer HG
    Genetics; 1999 Dec; 153(4):1949-58. PubMed ID: 10581298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Host-parasite coevolution and selection on sex through the effects of segregation.
    Agrawal AF; Otto SP
    Am Nat; 2006 Nov; 168(5):617-29. PubMed ID: 17080361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evolution of segregation distortion: potential for a high degree of polymorphism.
    van Boven M; Weissing FJ
    J Theor Biol; 1998 May; 192(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 9637055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A chip off the old block: a model for the evolution of genomic imprinting via selection for parental similarity.
    Spencer HG; Clark AG
    Genetics; 2006 Oct; 174(2):931-5. PubMed ID: 16951072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Distorted segregation in plant hybrids and its implication for evolution.
    Wang Z
    Yi Chuan; 2016 Sep; 38(9):801-10. PubMed ID: 27644741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. On the origin of meiotic reproduction: a genetic modifier model.
    Uyenoyama MK; Bengtsson BO
    Genetics; 1989 Dec; 123(4):873-85. PubMed ID: 2612898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genes that bias Mendelian segregation.
    Grognet P; Lalucque H; Malagnac F; Silar P
    PLoS Genet; 2014; 10(5):e1004387. PubMed ID: 24830502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Complex segregation analysis of obsessive-compulsive disorder in families with pediatric probands.
    Hanna GL; Fingerlin TE; Himle JA; Boehnke M
    Hum Hered; 2005; 60(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 16088199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rapid rise and fall of selfish sex-ratio X chromosomes in Drosophila simulans: spatiotemporal analysis of phenotypic and molecular data.
    Bastide H; Cazemajor M; Ogereau D; Derome N; Hospital F; Montchamp-Moreau C
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Sep; 28(9):2461-70. PubMed ID: 21498605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sex-specific viability, sex linkage and dominance in genomic imprinting.
    Van Cleve J; Feldman MW
    Genetics; 2007 Jun; 176(2):1101-18. PubMed ID: 17435253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Genetic Analysis Workshop II: further consideration of segregation and linkage analyses in Problem 3.
    Kramer PL; Altmann DB; Kidd KK
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 14971372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Population models of genomic imprinting. II. Maternal and fertility selection.
    Spencer HG; Dorn T; LoFaro T
    Genetics; 2006 Aug; 173(4):2391-8. PubMed ID: 16783015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Testing for segregation distortion in genetic scoring data from backcross or doubled haploid populations.
    Nixon J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2006 Apr; 96(4):290-7. PubMed ID: 16508663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of recombination and selection in the modifier theory of sex-ratio distortion.
    Lessard S
    Theor Popul Biol; 1987 Apr; 31(2):339-58. PubMed ID: 3590035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A mathematical model for recessive lethal segregation distorters with differential viabilities in the sexes.
    Hartl DL
    Genetics; 1970 Sep; 66(1):147-63. PubMed ID: 5512469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prp4 kinase is required for proper segregation of chromosomes during meiosis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
    Pozgajova M; Cipak L; Trakovicka A
    Acta Biochim Pol; 2013; 60(4):871-3. PubMed ID: 24432349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evolution at the mouse t complex: why is the t haplotype preserved as an integral unit?
    van Boven M; Weissing FJ
    Evolution; 2000 Oct; 54(5):1795-808. PubMed ID: 11108606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spindle formation, chromosome segregation and the spindle checkpoint in mammalian oocytes and susceptibility to meiotic error.
    Vogt E; Kirsch-Volders M; Parry J; Eichenlaub-Ritter U
    Mutat Res; 2008 Mar; 651(1-2):14-29. PubMed ID: 18096427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The evolution of intratetrad mating rates.
    Johnson LJ; Antonovics J; Hood ME
    Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2525-32. PubMed ID: 16526501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Centromere-associated female meiotic drive entails male fitness costs in monkeyflowers.
    Fishman L; Saunders A
    Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5907):1559-62. PubMed ID: 19056989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.