These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15911590)

  • 1. Incorporation of competitive effects in forest tree or animal breeding programs.
    Muir WM
    Genetics; 2005 Jul; 170(3):1247-59. PubMed ID: 15911590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic evaluation of early egg production and maturation traits using two different approaches in Japanese quail.
    Abou Khadiga G; Mahmoud BY; El-Full EA
    Poult Sci; 2016 Apr; 95(4):774-9. PubMed ID: 26769265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short-term selection for four-week body weight in Japanese quail.
    Anthony NB; Nestor KE; Marks HL
    Poult Sci; 1996 Oct; 75(10):1192-7. PubMed ID: 8893293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of index selection and best linear unbiased prediction for simulated layer poultry data.
    Jeyaruban MG; Gibson JP; Gowe RS
    Poult Sci; 1995 Oct; 74(10):1566-76. PubMed ID: 8559719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selection on individual phenotype and best linear unbiased predictor of breeding value in a closed swine herd.
    Belonsky GM; Kennedy BW
    J Anim Sci; 1988 May; 66(5):1124-31. PubMed ID: 3397339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental selection for calving ease and postnatal growth in seven cattle populations. I. Changes in estimated breeding values.
    Bennett GL
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Sep; 86(9):2093-102. PubMed ID: 18441073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic evaluation of meat quality traits and their correlation with growth and carcase composition in Japanese quail.
    Zerehdaran S; Lotfi E; Rasouli Z
    Br Poult Sci; 2012; 53(6):756-62. PubMed ID: 23398419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of selection methods at the same level of inbreeding.
    Quinton M; Smith C; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Apr; 70(4):1060-7. PubMed ID: 1582935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic properties of egg quality traits and their correlations with performance traits in Japanese quail.
    Lotfi E; Zerehdaran S; Raoufi Z
    Br Poult Sci; 2012; 53(5):585-91. PubMed ID: 23281751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of selection based on phenotype, selection index and best linear unbiased prediction using data from a closed broiler line.
    Morris AJ; Pollott GE
    Br Poult Sci; 1997 Jul; 38(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 9280349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.
    Calus MP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):52. PubMed ID: 25928875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic evaluation of weekly body weight in Japanese quail using random regression models.
    Karami K; Zerehdaran S; Tahmoorespur M; Barzanooni B; Lotfi E
    Br Poult Sci; 2017 Feb; 58(1):13-18. PubMed ID: 27982692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
    Muir WM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Multi-Trait Selection on Phenotypic and Genetic Changes in Japanese Quail (
    Narinç D; Aksoy T; Kaplan S
    J Poult Sci; 2016 Apr; 53(2):103-110. PubMed ID: 32908371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic evaluation and selection response for growth in meat-type quail through random regression models using B-spline functions and Legendre polynomials.
    Mota LFM; Martins PGMA; Littiere TO; Abreu LRA; Silva MA; Bonafé CM
    Animal; 2018 Apr; 12(4):667-674. PubMed ID: 28803586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic evaluation of an index of birth weight and yearling weight to improve efficiency of beef production.
    MacNeil MD
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Oct; 81(10):2425-33. PubMed ID: 14552368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency of genomic selection in a purebred pig male line.
    Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4164-76. PubMed ID: 22859761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic analyses of partial egg production in Japanese quail using multi-trait random regression models.
    Karami K; Zerehdaran S; Barzanooni B; Lotfi E
    Br Poult Sci; 2017 Dec; 58(6):624-628. PubMed ID: 28901781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Animal model and multiple trait BLUP applied in poultry genetic evaluation].
    Pang H; Wu CX; Zhang Y; Gong GF; Bi YH
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 1989; 16(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 2486251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
    Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.