These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15911590)

  • 21. Genomic selection models double the accuracy of predicted breeding values for bacterial cold water disease resistance compared to a traditional pedigree-based model in rainbow trout aquaculture.
    Vallejo RL; Leeds TD; Gao G; Parsons JE; Martin KE; Evenhuis JP; Fragomeni BO; Wiens GD; Palti Y
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):17. PubMed ID: 28148220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reverse selection in a Japanese quail line previously selected for 4-week body weight.
    Marks HL
    Poult Sci; 1980 Jun; 59(6):1149-54. PubMed ID: 7402982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimal strategies for the use of genomic selection in dairy cattle breeding programs.
    Wensch-Dorendorf M; Yin T; Swalve HH; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4140-51. PubMed ID: 21787949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracies of breeding values for dry matter intake using nongenotyped animals and predictor traits in different lactations.
    Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):9103-9114. PubMed ID: 28865857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An alternative derivation method of mixed model equations from best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) and restricted BLUP of breeding values not using maximum likelihood.
    Satoh M
    Anim Sci J; 2018 Jun; 89(6):876-879. PubMed ID: 29687542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Different methods to calculate genomic predictions--comparisons of BLUP at the single nucleotide polymorphism level (SNP-BLUP), BLUP at the individual level (G-BLUP), and the one-step approach (H-BLUP).
    Koivula M; Strandén I; Su G; Mäntysaari EA
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4065-73. PubMed ID: 22720963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Optimal multiple trait selection for multiple linked quantitative trait loci.
    Tang GQ; Li XW
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 Mar; 33(3):220-9. PubMed ID: 16553210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Forty generations of bidirectional selection for mating frequency in male Japanese quail.
    Yang N; Dunnington EA; Siegel PB
    Poult Sci; 1998 Oct; 77(10):1469-77. PubMed ID: 9776052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genetic analysis on the direct response to divergent selection for phytate phosphorus bioavailability in a randombred chicken population.
    Zhang W; Aggrey SE; Pesti GM; Bakalli RI; Edwards HM
    Poult Sci; 2005 Mar; 84(3):370-5. PubMed ID: 15782904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Parental sex effect of parthenogenesis on progeny production and performance of Chinese Painted Quail (Coturnix chinensis).
    Ramachandran R; Nascimento Dos Santos M; Parker HM; McDaniel CD
    Theriogenology; 2018 Sep; 118():96-102. PubMed ID: 29886358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A molecular genome scan to identify DNA segments associated with live weight in Japanese quail.
    Iranmanesh M; Esmailizadeh A; Mohammad Abadi MR; Zand E; Mokhtari MS; Wu DD
    Mol Biol Rep; 2016 Nov; 43(11):1267-1272. PubMed ID: 27562854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of BLUE and BLUP/REML in the selection of clones and families of potato (Solanum tuberosum).
    Ticona-Benavente CA; da Silva Filho DF
    Genet Mol Res; 2015 Dec; 14(4):18421-30. PubMed ID: 26782490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A method of calculating weighted values of objective traits for BLUP of breeding values to achieve relative desired changes.
    Satoh M
    Anim Sci J; 2024; 95(1):e13933. PubMed ID: 38411320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genomic selection for the improvement of meat quality in beef.
    Pimentel EC; König S
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3418-26. PubMed ID: 22665643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
    Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genetic parameters for feed efficiency and body weight traits in Japanese quail.
    Nasiri Foomani N; Zerehdaran S; Ahani Azari M; Lotfi E
    Br Poult Sci; 2014; 55(3):298-304. PubMed ID: 24851993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genetic change results from selection on an economic breeding objective in beef cattle.
    Enns RM; Nicoll GB
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Dec; 86(12):3348-57. PubMed ID: 18469047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.