These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15912873)

  • 1. The variance of d' estimates obtained in yes-no and two-interval forced choice procedures.
    Jesteadt W
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jan; 67(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 15912873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The law of categorical judgment (Corrected) and the interpretation of changes in psychophysical performance.
    Rosner BS; Kochanski G
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 19159150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A table of d' for M-alternative odd-man-out forced-choice procedures.
    Craven BJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Apr; 51(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 1603651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The dispersions of estimates of sensitivity obtained from four psychophysical procedures: implications for experimental design.
    Hautus MJ; Lee AJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 May; 60(4):638-49. PubMed ID: 9628995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recovering the variance of d' from hit and false alarm statistics.
    Botella J; Suero M
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Feb; 52(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 30684227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining the standard model of signal detection theory in motion discrimination.
    Liang J; Zhou Y; Liu Z
    J Vis; 2016 May; 16(7):9. PubMed ID: 27177389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensory discrimination: decision process.
    Johnson KO
    J Neurophysiol; 1980 Jun; 43(6):1771-92. PubMed ID: 6251182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Type I error rates and power analyses for single-point sensitivity measures.
    Rotello CM; Masson ME; Verde MF
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):389-401. PubMed ID: 18372758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. IV. Figures of merit for model performance in multiple-alternative forced-choice detection tasks with correlated responses.
    Eckstein MP; Abbey CK; Bochud FO
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2000 Feb; 17(2):206-17. PubMed ID: 10680622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A further test of sequential-sampling models that account for payoff effects on response bias in perceptual decision tasks.
    Diederich A
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):229-56. PubMed ID: 18372746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The sampling distribution of d'.
    Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Jan; 58(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 8668521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The dynamics of experimentally induced criterion shifts.
    Brown S; Steyvers M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):587-99. PubMed ID: 16060767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variance of d' for the same-different method.
    Bi J
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2002 Feb; 34(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 12060988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developing Bayesian adaptive methods for estimating sensitivity thresholds (d') in Yes-No and forced-choice tasks.
    Lesmes LA; Lu ZL; Baek J; Tran N; Dosher BA; Albright TD
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1070. PubMed ID: 26300798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measures of metacognitive efficiency across cognitive models of decision confidence.
    Rausch M; Hellmann S; Zehetleitner M
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38095989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determinants of the benefit for consistent spatial mappings in dual-task performance of three-choice tasks.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1771-81. PubMed ID: 19933561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods.
    Burgess AE
    Med Phys; 1995 May; 22(5):643-55. PubMed ID: 7643805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Study on simple reaction and choice times in patients with type I diabetes.
    Padilla-Medina JA; Prado-Olivarez J; Amador-Licona N; Cardona-Torres LM; Galicia-Resendiz D; Diaz-Carmona J
    Comput Biol Med; 2013 May; 43(4):368-76. PubMed ID: 23402936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Choice and response time processes in the identification and categorization of unidimensional stimuli.
    Lacouture Y; Marley AA
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Oct; 66(7):1206-26. PubMed ID: 15751477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interaural correlation sensitivity.
    Culling JF; Colburn HS; Spurchise M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1020-9. PubMed ID: 11519570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.