These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15913693)

  • 1. Comparison of laser interferometry and radiation force method of measuring ultrasonic power.
    Madelin G; Hosten B; Biateau C; Mougenot C; Franconi JM; Thiaudière E
    Ultrasonics; 2005 Oct; 43(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 15913693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation force calculations for ultrasonic fields from rectangular weakly focusing transducers.
    Beissner K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):1941-9. PubMed ID: 19062833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic power measurement of high intensity focused ultrasound in medicine based on radiation force.
    Shou W; Huang X; Duan S; Xia R; Shi Z; Geng X; Li F
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e17-20. PubMed ID: 16860359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An ultrasound mini-balance for measurement of therapy level ultrasound.
    Sutton Y; McBride K; Pye S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jul; 51(14):3397-404. PubMed ID: 16825738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A buoyancy method for the measurement of total ultrasound power generated by HIFU transducers.
    Shaw A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1327-42. PubMed ID: 18471952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of focused ultrasonic fields using a scanning laser vibrometer.
    Wang Y; Tyrer J; Zhihong P; Shiquan W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):2621-7. PubMed ID: 17550161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimum radiation force target size for power measurements in focused ultrasonic fields with circular symmetry.
    Beissner K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3355-62. PubMed ID: 21218869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between acoustic power and acoustic radiation force on absorbing and reflecting targets for spherically focusing radiators.
    Gélat P; Shaw A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 41(3):832-44. PubMed ID: 25683223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multicomponent wavefield characterization with a novel scanning laser interferometer.
    Blum TE; van Wijk K; Pouet B; Wartelle A
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2010 Jul; 81(7):073101. PubMed ID: 20687699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound transducers using acoustic streaming.
    Hariharan P; Myers MR; Robinson RA; Maruvada SH; Sliwa J; Banerjee RK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1706-19. PubMed ID: 18345858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elastic properties of soft tissue-mimicking phantoms assessed by combined use of laser ultrasonics and low coherence interferometry.
    Li C; Huang Z; Wang RK
    Opt Express; 2011 May; 19(11):10153-63. PubMed ID: 21643273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analytical and numerical calculations of optimum design frequency for focused ultrasound therapy and acoustic radiation force.
    Ergün AS
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Oct; 51(7):786-94. PubMed ID: 21459399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic field modeling for physiotherapy ultrasound applicators by using approximated functions of measured non-uniform radiation distributions.
    Gutiérrez MI; Calás H; Ramos A; Vera A; Leija L
    Ultrasonics; 2012 Aug; 52(6):767-77. PubMed ID: 22405588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of finite aperture and frequency response of ultrasonic hydrophone probes on the determination of acoustic output.
    Radulescu EG; Lewin PA; Wójcik J; Nowicki A; Berger WA
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):367-72. PubMed ID: 15047313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasonic imaging using air-coupled P(VDF/TrFE) transducers at 2 MHz.
    Takahashi S; Ohigashi H
    Ultrasonics; 2009 May; 49(4-5):495-8. PubMed ID: 19215951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A finite-element model of the aperture method for determining the effective radiating area of physiotherapy treatment heads.
    Gélat PN; Zeqiri B; Hodnett M
    Ultrasonics; 2005 Mar; 43(5):321-30. PubMed ID: 15737382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fresnel approximations for acoustic fields of rectangularly symmetric sources.
    Mast TD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3311-22. PubMed ID: 17552683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extending the frequency range of the National Physical Laboratory primary standard laser interferometer for hydrophone calibrations to 80 MHz.
    Esward TJ; Robinson SP
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1999; 46(3):737-44. PubMed ID: 18238474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of evanescent wave properties of a bulk acoustic wave resonator.
    Kokkonen K; Meltaus J; Pensala T; Kaivola M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Mar; 59(3):557-9. PubMed ID: 22481792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring derived acoustic power of an ultrasound surgical device in the linear and nonlinear operating modes.
    Petosić A; Ivancević B; Svilar D
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Jun; 49(6-7):522-31. PubMed ID: 19217636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.