These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15914061)

  • 1. [Automation of the immunohematology laboratory].
    Delamaire M
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2005 Jun; 12(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 15914061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of two automated instruments for pre-transfusion testing: AutoVue Innova and Techno TwinStation.
    Shin SY; Kwon KC; Koo SH; Park JW; Ko CS; Song JH; Sung JY
    Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Jun; 28(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 18594174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of immunohematologic routine methods using the new erythrocyte-magnetized technology on the QWALYS 2 system.
    Schoenfeld H; Bulling K; von Heymann C; Neuner B; Kalus U; Kiesewetter H; Pruss A
    Transfusion; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1347-52. PubMed ID: 19389030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exponential error reduction in pretransfusion testing with automation.
    South SF; Casina TS; Li L
    Transfusion; 2012 Aug; 52(8):81S-87S. PubMed ID: 22882101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Validation of antibody screening by indirect antigloblin test and ABO blood typing by filtration and microplate techniques: assessment of robustness].
    Mannessier L; Delamaire M; Bouix O; Krause C; Roubinet F
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2006 Oct; 13(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 16997595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evolving methods in immunohematology].
    Chiaroni J; Mannessier L
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2000 Jun; 7 Suppl 1():44s-50s. PubMed ID: 10919224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New techniques for compatibility testing.
    Plapp FV
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1989 Mar; 113(3):262-9. PubMed ID: 2493236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antibody identification using both automated solid-phase red cell adherence assay and a tube polyethylene glycol antiglobulin method.
    Yamada C; Serrano-Rahman L; Vasovic LV; Mohandas K; Uehlinger J
    Transfusion; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1693-8. PubMed ID: 18482178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Erytra® fully automated analyser for Routine Use in Transfusion Laboratory.
    Chang C; Brown M; Davies L; Pointon L; Brown R; Barker D
    Transfus Med; 2014 Feb; 24(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 24188135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Automation of immunohematologic testing activities at French blood transfusion centers].
    Muller A; Girard M
    Rev Fr Transfus Immunohematol; 1983 Nov; 26(5):517-30. PubMed ID: 6420869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated blood grouping by gel technology.
    Parker PI; Scott Y; McArdle B; Wallis JP
    Br J Biomed Sci; 1995 Dec; 52(4):266-70. PubMed ID: 8555780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of an automated microplate technique in the Galileo system for ABO and Rh(D) blood grouping.
    Xu W; Wan F; Lou Y; Jin J; Mao W
    Clin Lab; 2014; 60(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 24660536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An experience of the introduction of a blood bank automation system (Ortho AutoVue Innova) in a regional acute hospital.
    Cheng YW; Wilkinson JM
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2015 Aug; 53(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 25863409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Erythrocyte-magnetized technology: an original and innovative method for blood group serology.
    Bouix O; Ferrera V; Delamaire M; Redersdorff JC; Roubinet F
    Transfusion; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1878-85. PubMed ID: 18522706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Definition of maximum permissible errors for major physical parameters affecting the result of microplate ABO-RH1 blood grouping].
    Bouix O; Sanchez P; Reifenberg JM
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2007 Aug; 14(3):348-51. PubMed ID: 17482497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of weak D with a fully automated solid-phase red cell adherence system.
    Lai M; Mavilia G; d'Onofrio G; Leone G
    Transfusion; 2005 May; 45(5):689-93. PubMed ID: 15847655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative sensitivity of solid phase versus PEG enhancement assays for detection and identification of RBC antibodies.
    Dwyre DM; Erickson Y; Heintz M; Elbert C; Strauss RG
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2006 Aug; 35(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 16905362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Analysis of Clinical Samples Showing Weak Serum Reaction on AutoVue System Causing ABO Blood Typing Discrepancies.
    Jo SY; Lee JM; Kim HL; Sin KH; Lee HJ; Chang CL; Kim HH
    Ann Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(2):117-123. PubMed ID: 28028997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The suitability of hemolyzed specimens for compatibility testing using automated technology.
    Laga A; Cheves T; Maroto S; Coutts M; Sweeney J
    Transfusion; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1713-20. PubMed ID: 18482191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Telemedicine in the blood transfusion laboratory: remote interpretation of pre-transfusion tests.
    Meza M; Breskvar M; Kosir A; Bricl I; Tasic J; Rozman P
    J Telemed Telecare; 2007; 13(7):357-62. PubMed ID: 17958938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.