243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15914348)
1. Visual analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings: inter- and intra-observer agreement and impact of knowledge of neonatal outcome.
Figueras F; Albela S; Bonino S; Palacio M; Barrau E; Hernandez S; Casellas C; Coll O; Cararach V
J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 15914348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
Devane D; Lalor J
J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new national institute of child health and human development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system.
Devoe L; Golde S; Kilman Y; Morton D; Shea K; Waller J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 10942470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
Rei M; Tavares S; Pinto P; Machado AP; Monteiro S; Costa A; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J; Ayres-De-Campos D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():27-31. PubMed ID: 27566218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN.
Westerhuis ME; van Horen E; Kwee A; van der Tweel I; Visser GH; Moons KG
BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 19250366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracing by physician and computer.
Bracero LA; Roshanfekr D; Byrne DW
J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 10914628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intrapartum cardiotocography -- the dilemma of interpretational variation.
Palomäki O; Luukkaala T; Luoto R; Tuimala R
J Perinat Med; 2006; 34(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 16856819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual interpretation of the effect of maternal betamethasone administration on the fetal heart rate pattern.
van Iddekinge B; Hofmeyr GJ; Buchmann E
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Jul; 23(4):360-3. PubMed ID: 12881071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal heart rate tracings: observers versus computer assessment.
Todros T; Preve CU; Plazzotta C; Biolcati M; Lombardo P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1996 Sep; 68(1-2):83-6. PubMed ID: 8886686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of neonatal state by computer analysis of fetal heart rate tracings: the antepartum arm of the SisPorto multicentre validation study.
Ayres-de-Campos D; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J;
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jan; 118(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 15596273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Knowledge of adverse neonatal outcome alters clinicians' interpretation of the intrapartum cardiotocograph.
Ayres-de-Campos D; Arteiro D; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J
BJOG; 2011 Jul; 118(8):978-84. PubMed ID: 21609381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Linear and nonlinear analysis of heart rate patterns associated with fetal behavioral states in the antepartum period.
Gonçalves H; Bernardes J; Rocha AP; Ayres-de-Campos D
Early Hum Dev; 2007 Sep; 83(9):585-91. PubMed ID: 17261357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter-observer agreement in clinical decision-making for abnormal cardiotocogram (CTG) during labour: a comparison between CTG and CTG plus STAN.
Vayssière C; Tsatsaris V; Pirrello O; Cristini C; Arnaud C; Goffinet F
BJOG; 2009 Jul; 116(8):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. PubMed ID: 19515149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of fetal heart-rate variability interpretation by obstetricians using the criteria of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development compared with computer-aided interpretation.
Tongsong T; Iamthongin A; Wanapirak C; Piyamongkol W; Sirichotiyakul S; Boonyanurak P; Tatiyapornkul T; Neelasri C
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Feb; 31(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 15669996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of fetal base excess values at birth using an algorithm to interpret fetal heart rate tracings: a retrospective validation.
Uccella S; Cromi A; Colombo G; Agosti M; Bogani G; Casarin J; Ghezzi F
BJOG; 2012 Dec; 119(13):1657-64. PubMed ID: 23061674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation System.
Blackwell SC; Grobman WA; Antoniewicz L; Hutchinson M; Gyamfi Bannerman C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 205(4):378.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21864826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Pre-partum cardiotocography: comparison between the traditional and the computed systems].
Soncini E; Grignaffini A; Vadora E
Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense; 2000; 71 Suppl 1():337-43. PubMed ID: 11424766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography in singleton pregnancies.
Ojala K; Mäkikallio K; Haapsamo M; Ijäs H; Tekay A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(5):536-40. PubMed ID: 18446537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and evaluation of an algorithm for computer analysis of maternal heart rate during labor.
Pinto P; Bernardes J; Costa-Santos C; Amorim-Costa C; Silva M; Ayres-de-Campos D
Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jun; 49():30-5. PubMed ID: 24727565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability in cardiotocography interpretation - impact of extended on-site education in addition to web-based learning: an observational study.
Gyllencreutz E; Hulthén Varli I; Lindqvist PG; Holzmann M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Apr; 96(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 28052320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
