These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15914475)

  • 1. Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography.
    Sickles EA; Miglioretti DL; Ballard-Barbash R; Geller BM; Leung JW; Rosenberg RD; Smith-Bindman R; Yankaskas BC
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):775-90. PubMed ID: 15914475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance benchmarks for screening mammography.
    Rosenberg RD; Yankaskas BC; Abraham LA; Sickles EA; Lehman CD; Geller BM; Carney PA; Kerlikowske K; Buist DS; Weaver DL; Barlow WE; Ballard-Barbash R
    Radiology; 2006 Oct; 241(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 16990671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Lehman CD; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 27918707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Diagnostic Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Sprague BL; Arao RF; Miglioretti DL; Henderson LM; Buist DS; Onega T; Rauscher GH; Lee JM; Tosteson AN; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD;
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 28244803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The National Mammography Database: Preliminary Data.
    Lee CS; Bhargavan-Chatfield M; Burnside ES; Nagy P; Sickles EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):883-90. PubMed ID: 26866649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proposed biopsy performance benchmarks for MRI based on an audit of a large academic center.
    Sedora Román NI; Mehta TS; Sharpe RE; Slanetz PJ; Venkataraman S; Fein-Zachary V; Dialani V
    Breast J; 2018 May; 24(3):319-324. PubMed ID: 28833841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical outcome assessment in mammography: an audit of 7,506 screening and diagnostic mammography examinations.
    Tunçbilek I; Ozdemir A; Gültekin S; Oğur T; Erman R; Yüce C
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2007 Dec; 13(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 18092288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditing and benchmarks in screening and diagnostic mammography.
    Feig SA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):791-800, vi. PubMed ID: 17888769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists.
    Sickles EA; Wolverton DE; Dee KE
    Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):861-9. PubMed ID: 12202726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic mammography: identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria.
    Carney PA; Parikh J; Sickles EA; Feig SA; Monsees B; Bassett LW; Smith RA; Rosenberg R; Ichikawa L; Wallace J; Tran K; Miglioretti DL
    Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):359-67. PubMed ID: 23297329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures.
    Brown ML; Houn F; Sickles EA; Kessler LG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1373-7. PubMed ID: 7484568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical audit of diagnostic mammography examinations: comparison with screening outcomes obtained concurrently.
    Dee KE; Sickles EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Mar; 176(3):729-33. PubMed ID: 11222214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.
    Smith-Bindman R; Chu PW; Miglioretti DL; Sickles EA; Blanks R; Ballard-Barbash R; Bobo JK; Lee NC; Wallis MG; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
    JAMA; 2003 Oct; 290(16):2129-37. PubMed ID: 14570948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States.
    Buist DS; Anderson ML; Haneuse SJ; Sickles EA; Smith RA; Carney PA; Taplin SH; Rosenberg RD; Geller BM; Onega TL; Monsees BS; Bassett LW; Yankaskas BC; Elmore JG; Kerlikowske K; Miglioretti DL
    Radiology; 2011 Apr; 259(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 21343539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
    Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Abraham LA; Lehman CD; Yankaskas BC; Ballard-Barbash R; Barlow WE; Voeks JH; Geller BM; Carney PA; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):684-92. PubMed ID: 15734926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting.
    Birdwell RL; Bandodkar P; Ikeda DM
    Radiology; 2005 Aug; 236(2):451-7. PubMed ID: 16040901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study.
    Lehman CD; Isaacs C; Schnall MD; Pisano ED; Ascher SM; Weatherall PT; Bluemke DA; Bowen DJ; Marcom PK; Armstrong DK; Domchek SM; Tomlinson G; Skates SJ; Gatsonis C
    Radiology; 2007 Aug; 244(2):381-8. PubMed ID: 17641362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cancer detection rate: designing imaging trials to demonstrate improvements.
    Jiang Y; Miglioretti DL; Metz CE; Schmidt RA
    Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):360-7. PubMed ID: 17456866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast cancer detection with short-interval follow-up compared with return to annual screening in patients with benign stereotactic or US-guided breast biopsy results.
    Johnson JM; Johnson AK; O'Meara ES; Miglioretti DL; Geller BM; Hotaling EN; Herschorn SD
    Radiology; 2015 Apr; 275(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 25423143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.