These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15914645)

  • 21. [The Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test].
    Gavorník P
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 1998 Apr; 54(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 9622954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Test-retest Repeatability of the Ohio Contrast Cards.
    Osman M; Njeru SM; Hopkins GR; Brown AM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Sep; 98(9):1070-1077. PubMed ID: 34570031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. EVALUATING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION USING A NOVEL COMPUTER-BASED TEST, THE SPAETH/RICHMAN CONTRAST SENSITIVITY TEST.
    Faria BM; Duman F; Zheng CX; Waisbourd M; Gupta L; Ali M; Zangalli C; Lu L; Wizov SS; Spaeth E; Richman J; Spaeth GL
    Retina; 2015 Jul; 35(7):1465-73. PubMed ID: 25658175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Paper tools for assessing visual function.
    Powers MK
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 86(6):613-8. PubMed ID: 19483511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intermediate spatial frequency letter contrast sensitivity: its relation to visual resolution before and during amblyopia treatment.
    Moseley MJ; Stewart CE; Fielder AR; Stephens DA;
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 16390475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Relationship between contrast sensitivity and spherical aberration: comparison of 7 contrast sensitivity tests with natural and artificial pupils in healthy eyes.
    van Gaalen KW; Jansonius NM; Koopmans SA; Terwee T; Kooijman AC
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 19101424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of the contrast sensitivity card test for infants: retest variability and prediction of spatial resolution.
    Drover JR; Courage ML; Dalton SM; Adams RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Apr; 83(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 16614578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Measuring resolution in the contrast domain: the small letter contrast test.
    Rabin J; Wicks J
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 73(6):398-403. PubMed ID: 8807651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contrast sensitivity and glare in cataract using the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Williamson TH; Strong NP; Sparrow J; Aggarwal RK; Harrad R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1992 Dec; 76(12):719-22. PubMed ID: 1486072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reliability and validity of the Melbourne Edge Test and High/Low Contrast Visual Acuity chart.
    Haymes SA; Chen J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 May; 81(5):308-16. PubMed ID: 15181355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Visual contrast sensitivity testing: a comparison of two F.A.C.T. test types.
    Hitchcock EM; Dick RB; Krieg EF
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 15019960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of computer generated vision charts.
    Ehrmann K; Fedtke C; Radić A
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Jun; 32(3):133-40. PubMed ID: 19362877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test (SPARCS): design, reproducibility and ability to identify patients with glaucoma.
    Richman J; Zangalli C; Lu L; Wizov SS; Spaeth E; Spaeth GL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 25053760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual function of police officers who have undergone refractive surgery.
    Hovis JK; Ramaswamy S
    Am J Ind Med; 2006 Nov; 49(11):885-94. PubMed ID: 17036347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The validity of current clinical tests of contrast sensitivity and their ability to predict reading speed in low vision.
    Leat SJ; Woo GC
    Eye (Lond); 1997; 11 ( Pt 6)():893-9. PubMed ID: 9537154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Contrast sensitivity and color vision in HIV-infected individuals without infectious retinopathy.
    Shah KH; Holland GN; Yu F; Van Natta M; Nusinowitz S;
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 16876510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of the rate of contrast change on the quality of contrast sensitivity assessment: a comparison of three psychophysical methods.
    Nio YK; Jansonius NM; Lamers P; Mager A; Zeinstra J; Kooijman AC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jan; 25(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 15649179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Normal values for a clinical test of letter-recognition contrast thresholds.
    Khanani AM; Brown SM; Xu KT
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2377-82. PubMed ID: 15519092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contrast letter acuity as a visual component for the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite.
    Balcer LJ; Baier ML; Cohen JA; Kooijmans MF; Sandrock AW; Nano-Schiavi ML; Pfohl DC; Mills M; Bowen J; Ford C; Heidenreich FR; Jacobs DA; Markowitz CE; Stuart WH; Ying GS; Galetta SL; Maguire MG; Cutter GR
    Neurology; 2003 Nov; 61(10):1367-73. PubMed ID: 14638957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Assessment of mesopic and contrast vision for driving licences: which cut-off values, which methods are appropriate?].
    Wilhelm H; Peters T; Durst W; Roelcke S; Quast R; Hütten M; Wilhelm B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2013 Nov; 230(11):1106-13. PubMed ID: 24190829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.