These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15914757)
1. Correcting the literature--retraction and republication. Fontanarosa PB; DeAngelis CD JAMA; 2005 May; 293(20):2536. PubMed ID: 15914757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. When things go wrong: correcting the scientific record. Pulverer B EMBO J; 2015 Oct; 34(20):2483-5. PubMed ID: 26467018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer-Review Fraud--Hacking the Scientific Publication Process. Haug CJ N Engl J Med; 2015 Dec; 373(25):2393-5. PubMed ID: 26488392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reflections on a retraction. Kennedy D Science; 2000 Aug; 289(5482):1137. PubMed ID: 10970223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Letter to the editor: retraction of the Séralini et al. article. Roberfroid M Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Mar; 65():390. PubMed ID: 24394492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Letter to the editor: retraction of the Séralini et al. article. Rosanoff A Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Mar; 65():389. PubMed ID: 24394485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Letter to the editor. retraction of the Séralini et al. article. Folta K Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Mar; 65():392. PubMed ID: 24394484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Letter to the editor: retraction of the Séralini et al. article. John B Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Mar; 65():391. PubMed ID: 24394483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Update on Scholarly Publication Ethics: Navigating the Confusing Landscape. Reid C; Cress P Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Nov; 36(10):1195-1197. PubMed ID: 27329663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Correcting the literature: Improvement trends seen in contents of retraction notices. Deculllier E; Maisonneuve H BMC Res Notes; 2018 Jul; 11(1):490. PubMed ID: 30016985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview. Qi X; Deng H; Guo X Postgrad Med J; 2017 Aug; 93(1102):499-503. PubMed ID: 27663911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy and integrity include hearing both sides. Wylie DT Optometry; 2010 Sep; 81(9):429. PubMed ID: 20728819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fake peer-review in research publication: revisiting research purpose and academic integrity. Hadi MA Int J Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 24(5):309-10. PubMed ID: 27623702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Editor in Chief of Food and Chemical Toxicology answers questions on retraction. Wallace Hayes A Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Mar; 65():394-5. PubMed ID: 24407018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Retraction recommended for enzyme-chip paper. Abbott A Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7306):540-1. PubMed ID: 20671680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Spotlight on plagiarism. Mertens S Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2010 Dec; 107(49):863-5. PubMed ID: 21191546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Retractions: the lessons for research institutions. Lancet; 2014 Jul; 384(9938):104. PubMed ID: 25016983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]