These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15915023)

  • 1. Development and validation of a perioperative satisfaction questionnaire.
    Auquier P; Pernoud N; Bruder N; Simeoni MC; Auffray JP; Colavolpe C; François G; Gouin F; Manelli JC; Martin C; Sapin C; Blache JL
    Anesthesiology; 2005 Jun; 102(6):1116-23. PubMed ID: 15915023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and validation of a perioperative satisfaction questionnaire in regional anesthesia.
    Maurice-Szamburski A; Bruder N; Loundou A; Capdevila X; Auquier P
    Anesthesiology; 2013 Jan; 118(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 23221859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-cultural adaptation, analysis of psychometric properties and validation of the Spanish version of a perioperative satisfaction questionnaire (EVAN-G).
    Benítez-Linero I; Fernández-Castellano G; Senent-Boza A; Sánchez-Carrillo F; Docobo-Durantez F
    Braz J Anesthesiol; 2021; 71(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 33712247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EVAN-G score in patients undergoing minimally invasive gynecology oncologic surgery in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program.
    Ferraioli D; Pouliquen C; Jauffret C; Charavil A; Blache G; Faucher M; Houvenaeghel G; El Hajj H; Lambaudie E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1966-1974. PubMed ID: 32546640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the translated version of the EVAN-G scale in a Chinese-speaking population.
    Wang X; Lin W; Liu L; Wu Z; Wu Y; Yao Y
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):358. PubMed ID: 36424549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of sedative premedication on patient experience after general anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial.
    Maurice-Szamburski A; Auquier P; Viarre-Oreal V; Cuvillon P; Carles M; Ripart J; Honore S; Triglia T; Loundou A; Leone M; Bruder N;
    JAMA; 2015 Mar; 313(9):916-25. PubMed ID: 25734733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of the French version of the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale (APAIS).
    Maurice-Szamburski A; Loundou A; Capdevila X; Bruder N; Auquier P
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2013 Oct; 11():166. PubMed ID: 24099176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Construction of a questionnaire measuring outpatients' opinion of quality of hospital consultation departments.
    Gasquet I; Villeminot S; Estaquio C; Durieux P; Ravaud P; Falissard B
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2004 Aug; 2():43. PubMed ID: 15294020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and validation of a French questionnaire concerning patients' perspectives of the quality of palliative care: the QUALI-PALLI-Patient.
    Guirimand F; Martel-Samb P; Guy-Coichard C; Picard S; Devalois B; Copel L; Abel A; Ghadi V;
    BMC Palliat Care; 2019 Feb; 18(1):19. PubMed ID: 30744627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the generic medical interview satisfaction scale: the G-MISS questionnaire.
    Maurice-Szamburski A; Michel P; Loundou A; Auquier P;
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Feb; 15(1):36. PubMed ID: 28196503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychometric Evaluation of a Treatment Acceptance Measure for Use in Patients Receiving Treatment via Subcutaneous Injection.
    Tatlock S; Arbuckle R; Sanchez R; Grant L; Khan I; Manvelian G; Spertus JA
    Value Health; 2017 Mar; 20(3):430-440. PubMed ID: 28292488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic review of questionnaires measuring patient satisfaction in ambulatory anesthesia.
    Chanthong P; Abrishami A; Wong J; Herrera F; Chung F
    Anesthesiology; 2009 May; 110(5):1061-7. PubMed ID: 19352161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preoperative Midazolam and Patient-Centered Outcomes of Older Patients: The I-PROMOTE Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Kowark A; Keszei AP; Schneider G; Pilge S; Schneider F; Obert DP; Georgii MT; Heim M; Rossaint R; Ziemann S; van Waesberghe J; Czaplik M; Pühringer FK; Minarski C; May V; Malisi T; Drexler B; Ring CM; Engler P; Tilly R; Bischoff P; Frey U; Wittmann M; Soehle M; Saller T; Kienbaum P; Kretzschmar M; Coburn M;
    JAMA Surg; 2024 Feb; 159(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 38117527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Crosscultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System.
    Kim SJ; Basur MS; Park CK; Chong S; Kang YG; Kim MJ; Jeong JS; Kim TK
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jun; 475(6):1629-1639. PubMed ID: 28265885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The reliability, validity, and preliminary responsiveness of the Eye Allergy Patient Impact Questionnaire (EAPIQ).
    Alexander M; Berger W; Buchholz P; Walt J; Burk C; Lee J; Arbuckle R; Abetz L
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2005 Oct; 3():67. PubMed ID: 16259630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient's satisfaction with perioperative care: development, validation, and application of a questionnaire.
    Caljouw MA; van Beuzekom M; Boer F
    Br J Anaesth; 2008 May; 100(5):637-44. PubMed ID: 18337271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and validation of a novel patient-reported treatment satisfaction measure for hyperfunctional facial lines: facial line satisfaction questionnaire.
    Pompilus F; Burgess S; Hudgens S; Banderas B; Daniels S
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2015 Dec; 14(4):274-85. PubMed ID: 26264134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].
    Corbière M; Lesage A; Lauzon S; Ricard N; Reinharz D
    Encephale; 2003; 29(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 14567162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new instrument to measure patient satisfaction with mammography. Validity, reliability, and discriminatory power.
    Loeken K; Steine S; Sandvik L; Laerum E
    Med Care; 1997 Jul; 35(7):731-41. PubMed ID: 9219499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS): tests of data quality and measurement properties.
    Ramsay J; Campbell JL; Schroter S; Green J; Roland M
    Fam Pract; 2000 Oct; 17(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 11021894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.