123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15915142)
1. [Evaluation and comparison of dose profiles and patient doses among X-ray CT scanners].
Matsubara K; Koshida K; Suzuki M; Fukuda A; Kawabata C; Tsujii H; Mizushima T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 May; 61(5):683-90. PubMed ID: 15915142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of z overscanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations.
Tzedakis A; Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Stratakis J; Gourtsoyiannis N
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1621-9. PubMed ID: 16013721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of radiation dose reduction of prospective ECG-gated one beat scan using 320 area detector CT coronary angiography and prospective ECG-gated helical scan with high helical pitch (FlashScan) using 64 multidetector-row CT coronary angiography].
Matsutani H; Sano T; Kondo T; Fujimoto S; Sekine T; Arai T; Morita H; Takase S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Dec; 66(12):1548-54. PubMed ID: 21282910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of radiation dose estimates, image noise, and scan duration in pediatric body imaging for volumetric and helical modes on 320-detector CT and helical mode on 64-detector CT.
Johnston JH; Podberesky DJ; Yoshizumi TT; Angel E; Toncheva G; Larson DB; Egelhoff JC; Anderson-Evans C; Nguyen GB; Barelli A; Alsip C; Salisbury SR; Frush DP
Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Sep; 43(9):1117-27. PubMed ID: 23636537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Organ dose and inherent uncertainty in helical CT dosimetry due to quasiperiodic dose distributions.
Winslow JF; Tien CJ; Hintenlang DE
Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3177-85. PubMed ID: 21815392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dual-source spiral CT with pitch up to 3.2 and 75 ms temporal resolution: image reconstruction and assessment of image quality.
Flohr TG; Leng S; Yu L; Aiimendinger T; Bruder H; Petersilka M; Eusemann CD; Stierstorfer K; Schmidt B; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5641-53. PubMed ID: 20095277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Axial or Helical? Considerations for wide collimation CT scanners capable of volumetric imaging in both modes.
Lambert JW; Phillips ED; Villanueva-Meyer JE; Nardo L; Facchetti L; Gould RG
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5718-5725. PubMed ID: 28833277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose evaluation for foetal computed tomography with a 320-row unit in wide-volume mode and an 80-row unit in helical scanning mode: a phantom study.
Matsunaga Y; Kawaguchi A; Kobayashi M; Suzuki S; Suzuki S; Chida K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Mar; 168(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 26224738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single versus multi-detector row CT: comparison of radiation doses and dose profiles.
Thomton FJ; Paulson EK; Yoshizumi TT; Frush DP; Nelson RC
Acad Radiol; 2003 Apr; 10(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 12678177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Report on the 89th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America--analysis of radiation dose by a change of a scan parameter of multi-slice computed tomography by a film method].
Akagi N; Ohkawa Y; Kadohisa S; Nakagiri Y; Hiraki Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Dec; 60(12):1664-5. PubMed ID: 15614213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scan time and patient dose for thoracic imaging in neonates and small children using axial volumetric 320-detector row CT compared to helical 64-, 32-, and 16- detector row CT acquisitions.
Kroft LJ; Roelofs JJ; Geleijns J
Pediatr Radiol; 2010 Mar; 40(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 19997730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation and comparison of the radiation effective dose during coronary computed tomography angiography examinations on single-source 64-MDCT and dual-source 128-MDCT.
Khoramian D; Sistani S
J Radiol Prot; 2017 Dec; 37(4):826-836. PubMed ID: 28910264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of artifacts on coronal reformation and axial CT pulmonary angiography images using single-detector and 4- and 8-detector multidetector-row helical CT scanners.
Boiselle PM; Hasegawa I; Nishino M; Raptopoulos V; Hatabu H
Acad Radiol; 2005 May; 12(5):602-7. PubMed ID: 15866133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot.
Flohr TG; Stierstorfer K; Ulzheimer S; Bruder H; Primak AN; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2536-47. PubMed ID: 16193784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography(MDCT). ICRP Publication 102.
Valentin J;
Ann ICRP; 2007; 37(1):1-79, iii. PubMed ID: 18069128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic exposure control in multichannel CT with tube current modulation to achieve a constant level of image noise: experimental assessment on pediatric phantoms.
Brisse HJ; Madec L; Gaboriaud G; Lemoine T; Savignoni A; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):3018-33. PubMed ID: 17822010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving image quality by optimizing beam width and helical pitch in CT.
Jeon PH; Lee CL
J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(2):399-408. PubMed ID: 35095014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation dose evaluation in tomosynthesis and C-arm cone-beam CT examinations with an anthropomorphic phantom.
Koyama S; Aoyama T; Oda N; Yamauchi-Kawaura C
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4298-306. PubMed ID: 20879590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT angiography of neonates and infants: comparison of radiation dose and image quality of target mode prospectively ECG-gated 320-MDCT and ungated helical 64-MDCT.
Jadhav SP; Golriz F; Atweh LA; Zhang W; Krishnamurthy R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):W184-91. PubMed ID: 25615779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
