148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15915772)
1. [Blood stream infection and blood culture--"progress" and "blind" in blood culture testing].
Kobayashi I
Rinsho Byori; 2005 Apr; 53(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 15915772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic bottle to the isolator tube, BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle, and BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle and comparison of the BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle to the Isolator tube for recovery of bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi from blood.
Vetter E; Torgerson C; Feuker A; Hughes J; Harmsen S; Schleck C; Horstmeier C; Roberts G; Cockerill F
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Dec; 39(12):4380-6. PubMed ID: 11724848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Growth and detection of aerobic bacterial pathogens in BacT/Alert FA, BacT/Alert SA, Bactec Plus Aerobic/F and Bactec Standard Aerobic/F].
Cermák P; Sedláková P; Mejstríková L; Mazurová J
Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek; 2006 Aug; 12(4):156-60. PubMed ID: 16958021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of delayed-entry conditions on the recovery and detection of microorganisms from BacT/ALERT and BACTEC blood culture bottles.
Sautter RL; Bills AR; Lang DL; Ruschell G; Heiter BJ; Bourbeau PP
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 44(4):1245-9. PubMed ID: 16597846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the routine use of the anaerobic bottle when using the BACTEC blood culture system.
Karunakaran R; Raja NS; Quek KF; Hoe VC; Navaratnam P
J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2007 Oct; 40(5):445-9. PubMed ID: 17932606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Guidelines on blood cultures.
Towns ML; Jarvis WR; Hsueh PR
J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2010 Aug; 43(4):347-9. PubMed ID: 20688297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Detection of Brucella with an automatic hemoculture system: Bact/Alert].
Casas J; Partal Y; Llosá J; Leiva J; Navarro JM; de la Rosa M
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1994 Dec; 12(10):497-500. PubMed ID: 7865557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of various methods of hemoculture tests].
Benes J; Gabrielová A; Horová B; Zítko K; Rozsypal H; Dzupová O; Kabelková M
Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 1996 Sep; 45(3):101-7. PubMed ID: 8998600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of the detection of anaerobic bacteria in haemoculture systems BACTEC Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F, BacT/Alert FAN Anaerobic and BacT/Alert FN Anaerobic].
Cermák P; Förstl M
Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek; 2005 Jun; 11(3):100-4. PubMed ID: 16025428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of bacterial and yeast species with the Bactec 9120 automated system with routine use of aerobic, anaerobic, and fungal media.
Chiarini A; Palmeri A; Amato T; Immordino R; Distefano S; Giammanco A
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 46(12):4029-33. PubMed ID: 18923011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [An optimal blood culture technic].
Simon C; Bahr A; Kreller G; Kiosz D
Monatsschr Kinderheilkd; 1984 Mar; 132(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 6374431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Controlled clinical comparison of VersaTREK and BacT/ALERT blood culture systems.
Mirrett S; Hanson KE; Reller LB
J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 45(2):299-302. PubMed ID: 17122016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro evaluation of three bacterial culture systems for the recovery of Escherichia coli from equine blood.
Lorenzo-Figueras M; Pusterla N; Byrne BA; Samitz EM
Am J Vet Res; 2006 Dec; 67(12):2025-9. PubMed ID: 17144804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of bacteraemia in children seen in the outpatient department: a comparison of conventional blood culture methods and a Castaneda blood culture.
Brook I; Gruenwald LD
Microbios; 1982; 35(139):17-20. PubMed ID: 6759878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of detection speed and yield in agitated and non-agitated aerobic blood culture bottles.
Arpi M; Larsen SO
APMIS; 1992 Dec; 100(12):1061-5. PubMed ID: 1492974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bactec 9240 blood culture system: to preincubate at 35 degrees C or not?
Lemming L; Holt HM; Petersen IS; Østergaard C; Bruun B
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2004 Dec; 10(12):1089-91. PubMed ID: 15606636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rapid identification and susceptibility testing using the VITEK 2 system using culture fluids from positive BacT/ALERT blood cultures.
Chen JR; Lee SY; Yang BH; Lu JJ
J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2008 Jun; 41(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 18629422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In-house validation of the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system for detection of bacterial contamination in platelet concentrates.
Dunne WM; Case LK; Isgriggs L; Lublin DM
Transfusion; 2005 Jul; 45(7):1138-42. PubMed ID: 15987359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Sepsis and blood culture management].
Komatsu M; Fukuda S; Kawa N; Yamamoto Y; Matsuo S
Rinsho Byori; 2005 Apr; 53(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 15915771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Roadmap to approval: use of an automated sterility test method as a lot release test for Carticel, autologous cultured chondrocytes.
Kielpinski G; Prinzi S; Duguid J; du Moulin G
Cytotherapy; 2005; 7(6):531-41. PubMed ID: 16306015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
