These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15915794)

  • 1. Graphemic complexity and multiple print-to-sound associations in visual word recognition.
    Rey A; Schiller NO
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Jan; 33(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 15915794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Activation of multiple phoneme associates of graphemes in visual word recognition.
    Lange M
    Brain Lang; 2002; 81(1-3):610-20. PubMed ID: 12081426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When parallel processing in visual word recognition is not enough: new evidence from naming.
    Roberts MA; Rastle K; Coltheart M; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Jun; 10(2):405-14. PubMed ID: 12921417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Letter-by-letter processing in the phonological conversion of multiletter graphemes: searching for sounds in printed pseudowords.
    Peereman R; Brand M; Rey A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 16724766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the orthographic/phonological onset a single unit in reading aloud?
    Mousikou P; Coltheart M; Saunders S; Yen L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):175-94. PubMed ID: 20121303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phonographic neighbors, not orthographic neighbors, determine word naming latencies.
    Adelman JS; Brown GD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Jun; 14(3):455-9. PubMed ID: 17874587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting children's word-spelling difficulty for common English words from measures of orthographic transparency, phonemic and graphemic length and word frequency.
    Spencer K
    Br J Psychol; 2007 May; 98(Pt 2):305-38. PubMed ID: 17456275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Graphemes are perceptual reading units.
    Rey A; Ziegler JC; Jacobs AM
    Cognition; 2000 Apr; 75(1):B1-12. PubMed ID: 10815779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A mesial-to-lateral dissociation for orthographic processing in the visual cortex.
    Bouhali F; Bézagu Z; Dehaene S; Cohen L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Oct; 116(43):21936-21946. PubMed ID: 31591198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of sublexical graphemic processing in reading.
    Joubert SA; Lecours AR
    Brain Lang; 2000 Mar; 72(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10716872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Absence of syllable effects: multisyllabic [correction of monosyllabic] words are easier than monosyllabic [correction of multisyllabic] words.
    Lee CH
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Aug; 93(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 11693709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The development of the orthographic consistency effect in speech recognition: from sublexical to lexical involvement.
    Ventura P; Morais J; Kolinsky R
    Cognition; 2007 Dec; 105(3):547-76. PubMed ID: 17250820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A dual-route cascaded model of reading by deaf adults: evidence for grapheme to viseme conversion.
    Elliott EA; Braun M; Kuhlmann M; Jacobs AM
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2012; 17(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 22159409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpretation of orthographic uniqueness point effects in visual word recognition.
    Lamberts K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 15709860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neighborhood effects on nonword visual processing in a language with shallow orthography.
    Arduino LS; Burani C
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2004 Jan; 33(1):75-95. PubMed ID: 15002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From word superiority to word inferiority: visual processing of letters and words in pure alexia.
    Habekost T; Petersen A; Behrmann M; Starrfelt R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2014; 31(5-6):413-36. PubMed ID: 24801564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neighbourhood density, word frequency, and spelling-sound regularity effects in naming: similarities and differences between skilled readers and the Dual Route Cascaded Computational model.
    Reynolds M; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2004 Mar; 58(1):13-31. PubMed ID: 15072206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regularity effects in word naming: what are they?
    Cortese MJ; Simpson GB
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Dec; 28(8):1269-76. PubMed ID: 11219954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
    Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of the consonant-vowel structure of written words in Italian.
    Chetail F; Scaltritti M; Content A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 May; 67(5):833-42. PubMed ID: 24661205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.