These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15915856)
1. On identifying research misconduct respondents. Parrish DM Sci Eng Ethics; 2005 Apr; 11(2):171-2. PubMed ID: 15915856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Due process in investigations of research misconduct. Mello MM; Brennan TA N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The United States Government scientific misconduct regulations and the handling of issues related to research integrity. Price AR J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():253-64. PubMed ID: 9857309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Scientific misconduct. Shalala takes watchdog office out of the hunt. Kaiser J Science; 1999 Oct; 286(5441):883. PubMed ID: 10577232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Trouble for Healy over misconduct office. Aldhous P Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6334):361. PubMed ID: 1650429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. At NIH, a new maelstrom over misconduct. Greenberg DS Lancet; 1991 Aug; 338(8762):301-2. PubMed ID: 1677123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The scientific misconduct process: a scientist's view from the inside. Youngner JS JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(1):62-4. PubMed ID: 9424047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific misconduct: the lessons of time. Commentary on "The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: scientific misconduct and beyond" (C. Pascal). Chubin DE Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 11657857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientific misconduct in US health service. Choo V Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8961):1359. PubMed ID: 11644692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Findings of scientific misconduct; notice. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Secretary Fed Regist; 1993 Jun; 58(117):33830-2. PubMed ID: 11645231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of the office of research integrity in cancer clinical trials. Abbrecht P; Davidian N; Merrill S; Price AR Cancer Treat Res; 2007; 132():231-9. PubMed ID: 17305026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct. Reynolds GH Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. No misconduct in 'gay gene' study. Kaiser J Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5304):1251. PubMed ID: 11644902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. ORI to study why cheaters cheat. Ready T Nat Med; 2000 Sep; 6(9):946. PubMed ID: 10973292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond. Pascal CB Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 11657856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]